I've been in touch with the FSA and I'm glad to say that the geocodes
for many establishments in Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor,
Portsmouth and South Tyneside are back, so their data can be accessed
using the comparison tool (http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs)
again.
Stirling is
Hi David,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:15:25PM +0100, David Woolley wrote:
Using postcode centroids is why so many self contributed business POIs
on Google Maps are almost useless for finding the business. I hope
no-one is adding POIs based on such data.
I agree. This is why the comparison to
On 23/10/17 16:23, Gregrs wrote:
I'm not sure; it seems to be reverse-geocoded from postcode centroids
(which is one reason I wouldn't recommend anyone directly copying FHRS
data into OSM without some manual processing). I have contacted the FSA
to see what can be done.
Using postcode centr
msung Galaxy smartphone.
Original message From: Gregrs Date:
23/10/2017 16:30 (GMT+00:00) To: "Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)"
Cc: talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:22:35PM +0100, R
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:22:35PM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
wrote:
If you still have postcodes for those, you can look up the postcode
centroid in Code-Point Open and use that as the lat/lon instead. (In
fact, I think that's what the locations you're currently showing ar
Hi David,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:03:11PM +0100, David Woolley wrote:
Is it possible that they were using NPLG data, that is not open?
I'm not sure; it seems to be reverse-geocoded from postcode centroids
(which is one reason I wouldn't recommend anyone directly copying FHRS
data into OS
On 23 October 2017 at 15:52, Gregrs wrote:
> Several authorities (Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor, Portsmouth and
> South Tyneside) seem to have removed geocodes for a large number of their
> FHRS establishments recently, as shown by the sharp dropoff towards the end
> of the first graph on t
On 23/10/17 15:52, Gregrs wrote:
Several authorities (Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor, Portsmouth
and South Tyneside) seem to have removed geocodes for a large number of
their FHRS establishments recently, as shown by the sharp dropoff
Is it possible that they were using NPLG data, that
The FHRS/OSM comparison tool (http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs)
now includes graphs showing progress for each district (e.g.
http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/district-91.html) and for the
whole of Great Britain
(http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs-stats/summary-graphs.html)
9 matches
Mail list logo