Re: vampire 002 now ready

Marck D Pearlstone writes: Just FYI, no releases of Vampire have done a thing here. Checking the log, it looks like its's trying to scan an empty message body body and always coming up false. Any suggestions? yeah, try to search in raw message, the interface to body are not ready in the the

Re: Ask on Vampire-Plugin

David van Zuijlekom writes: When can we expect attachment and body support? when ritlabs finish the interface for antispam plug'ins. atte, T.C. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBDEV information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Ask on Vampire-Plugin

Carsten Knobloch writes: Hallo taskcontrol, Am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2003 um 01:39 schriebst Du (oder zumindest teilweise): basura.cuerpos.trozos.txt function procesa(basura.cuerpos.trozos.txt) function procesa_trozo(BASURA.CUERPOS.TROZOS.TXT;:) *partial search for* PORNO *in* :

Re: vampire 002 now ready

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi , @28-Feb-2003, 07:43 -0700 (14:43 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: yeah, try to search in raw message, the interface to body are not ready in the the bat! side, it's ready in vampire because some day it will stay ready in the bat! Okay -

Re[2]: Ask on Vampire-Plugin

Estimados seguidores del tbdev arroba thebat.dutaint.com: En relación a lo que Thomas en su momento posteó: TM because i can't test it (running SpamPal ) a lot, can anybody now tell TM me if this Plugin is functioning well or not. In special the TM attachment filtering? I tested some parts,

TBDEV Mission Statement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings Dev Listers, This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you of the primary purpose of this discussion list. To review the list rules, follow the link at the end of this message.