Re[2]: encrypting messages

2020-03-27 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hello Christopher, Saturday, March 28, 2020, 11:33:06 AM, you wrote: > I've never used it, nor do I know if The Bat! can use this mode let > alone it's compatibility with other email clients. Possible with clients that support easy(ish) passing of key-data handling to pinentry. Also, I should

Re: encrypting messages

2020-03-27 Thread Christopher Warrington
On 2020-03-27 at 5:33 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > It is *technically* possible to use GPG in symmetric mode for messaging > purposes. > > ``` > $ echo "Hello World" > cleartext > $ gpg -o encrypted -c cleartext > ``` > > ...Then one needs to wrap the routine above into something palatable fo

Re[2]: encrypting messages

2020-03-27 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hello Christopher, Thank you for the well-constructed and informative message, I just wanted to add one small point to the below: >> What I would like to be able to do is send password-protected >> messages that can only be opened by the receiving party who has the >> password. Is that what this

Re: encrypting messages

2020-03-27 Thread Christopher Warrington
On 2020-03-23 at 12:55:15 PM, Achdut18 wrote: Before I go on and answer your more detailed questions, I urge you to think about the threat model that you and your colleague have. As with all things in security--whether online or offline--you will want to figure out which threats you care about a

Re: encrypting messages

2020-03-23 Thread Achdut18
HI, Last summer I posted a query about how to encrypt messages. The response left me more confused than when I started, so, I decided to carry on, as usual. M> On Tuesday 4 June 2019 at 3:08:56 AM, in M> , Avram Sacks wrote:- >> If I went to send an encrypted message to a client. What a

Re: encrypting messages

2019-06-04 Thread MFPA
Hi On Tuesday 4 June 2019 at 3:08:56 AM, in , Avram Sacks wrote:- > What is S/MIME? > What is OpenPGP? They are standards for signing and encrypting. In both cases you generate a key or certificate. Sometimes called a key pair because it actually consists of a public part you share and a pri

Re: encrypting messages

2019-06-04 Thread Avram Sacks
Please explain how this works. What is S/MIME? What is OpenPGP? Currently the bar reads "S/MIME + OpenPGP (auto)" What is happening automatically? There are also a picture of a locak and a green "Sign when complete" button to the right of the S/MIME + Open PGP (auto) bar. What do those bu

Re: encrypting messages

2019-05-24 Thread MFPA
Hi On Wednesday 22 May 2019 at 6:59:30 AM, in , Avram Sacks wrote:- > For what it is worth, the bar at the bottom of the > message window, > on the far right reads "S/MIME + OpenPGP (auto)." > Does this have > anything to do with what I want to do? Yes. -- Best regards MFPA

encrypting messages

2019-05-21 Thread Avram Sacks
HI, all. It's been a while since I had a question for this forum I will, occasionally, have a client who is concerned about the security of messages.Short of sending password-protected pdf files, is there a way to send an e-mail to someone who does not use The Bat, in such a way, that the

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 4:25:31 AM, A Curtis Martin wrote: > AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures. > However, to decrypt an encrypted message to you, you only need your > private key to decrypt it. The messages encryptio

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 11, 2001, at 11:56:22 PM, Silviu Cojocaru wrote: > It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to > someone, with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ? Correct. Contained within that Public Key are all the User Pre

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Thomas
Hello Allie, On Sat, 12 May 2001 06:25:31 -0500 GMT (12/05/2001, 19:25 +0800 GMT), A Curtis Martin wrote: T>> Would she? I think you do need the sender's public key to drecypt a T>> message. Maybe I'm wrong about this? ACM> AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures.

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread A Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 12 May 2001 18:42:34 +0800, Thomas contributed this to our collective wisdom: GE>> Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa, GE>> she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to GE>> verify the sig

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Thomas
Hello Gerd, On Sat, 12 May 2001 11:03:49 +0200 GMT (12/05/2001, 17:03 +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote: GE> Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa, GE> she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to GE> verify the signature but she could reveal the pla

Re[2]: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
Yes -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: Unsubscribe: You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David! On Saturday, May 12, 2001 at 9:18:02 AM you wrote: > No. You can encrypt the message to as many keys as you like the minimum is > one i.e. the recipient. However this is a bit silly as once encrypted you

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas ! On Sat, 12 May 2001 16:38:41 +0800 GMT your local time, which was 12.05.2001, 10:38 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: >>> And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I >>> sent to him/her, that user must have *my*

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Thomas
Hello Gerd, On Sat, 12 May 2001 09:50:25 +0200 GMT (12/05/2001, 15:50 +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote: >> And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I >> sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? GE> No, the recipients needs his/her secret key to decrypt the me

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Silviu Cojocaru ! On Sat, 12 May 2001 09:56:22 +0300 GMT your local time, which was 12.05.2001, 08:56 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: > It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send > to someone, with PGP, I need his/her

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Silviu On 12 May 2001 at 09:56:22 +0300 (which was 07:56 where I live) Silviu Cojocaru rearranged electrons to get > It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to someone, > with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ?

PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-11 Thread Silviu Cojocaru
It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to someone, with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ? And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? -- If Bill Gates had a dime for eve

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 07:27:45 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote: NA> After further reading Marck, I have to agree with you and Allie on NA> this. Apparently, if you want to force the PGP Recipient Dialogue NA> box to appear, hold down the SHIFT key while h

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:28:53 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: NA>> Well that seems strange, because that was not my experience when NA>> using TB! and 6.5.8 I can't see anything in your setup that was NA>> any different in how I had PGP's options

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 11 October 2000 at 07:07:42 GMT -0700 (which was 15:07 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points on the subject of "Encrypting Messages with PGP": >> That's it - and I always get (and always have got)

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On October 11, 2000 Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote: > I don't think it's a bug - I think it is how it is supposed to work. After further reading Marck, I have to agree with you and Allie on this. Apparently, if you want to force the PGP Recipient Dialogu

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 07:04:51 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote: NA> You make a good point there Allie, but what if you have more than NA> one Public Key associated with a given recipient... will TB!/6.5.8 NA> produce the dialogue box giving you a choice o

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On October 11, 2000 Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote: > That's it - and I always get (and always have got) the key selection > box when encrypting messages. This comes up before the pass-phrase > entry window IIRC. Well that seems strange

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On October 11, 2000 A. Curtis Martin Wrote: > No problem, but hang on there a minute Nick. If I wish to encrypt the > message to multiple recipients, when I address the message to the other > recipients, the encryption to the other recipients is also

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:24:48 +0200, Krister Ekstrom wrote: KE> I have similar problems as Nick describes with pgp v6.5.8. I've just KE> switched to the ckt build of pgp 6.5.8 and have yet to post a KE> message which is encrypted to see if i have th

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread Krister Ekstrom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! on Wednesday, October 11, 2000 02:21:04, our bat friend Marck D. Pearlstone typed: NA>> Can someone please verify that for me, and if that is the case, I NA>> want to put in a feature request to Stef and Max. PGP is designed NA>> to give you th

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 11 October 2000 at 20:23:26 GMT -0700 (which was 04:23 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points on the subject of "Encrypting Messages with PGP": >> IOW's the box seems to pop up only when there is s

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 11 October 2000 at 17:50:57 GMT -0700 (which was 01:50 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points on the subject of "Encrypting Messages with PGP": >> That's not what I see. I get a selection dialog sh

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-10 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:23:26 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote: NA> Being able to choose multiple recipients is a feature of PGP's encryption NA> process, so not having that choice when using TB! is a clear indication NA> that the problem rests with the p

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-10 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On October 10, 2000 A. Curtis Martin Wrote: > IOW's the box seems to pop up only when there is some uncertainty as to > which key to use. Thanks for the confirmation Allie. The mere fact that the dialogue box doesn't appear under all conditions, is

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-10 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 01:21:04 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: NA>> If I remember correctly when I was using PGP 6.5.8 via TB!'s NA>> plug-in, no such dialogue box appeared, and the message was simply NA>> encrypted to whomever it was addressed to

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-10 Thread Gary
Hi Marck, On Tuesday, October 10, 2000, 7:21 PM, you wrote in part about "Encrypting Messages with PGP": M> That's not what I see. I get a selection dialog showing the two keys M> which TB/PGP is intending to use (the recipient's and my default key) M> in a small l

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-10 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On October 10, 2000 Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote: > That's not what I see. I get a selection dialog showing the two keys > which TB/PGP is intending to use (the recipient's and my default key) > in a small lower panel and allowing me to select any other

Re: Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-10 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 11 October 2000 at 16:36:54 GMT -0700 (which was 00:36 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points on the subject of "Encrypting Messages with PGP": NA> If I remember correctly when I was using PGP 6.5.8 via T

Encrypting Messages with PGP

2000-10-10 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Everyone, I use PGP 7.0 for which there is no plug-in yet, so I run all my PGP operations through PGP Tray. When I encrypt a message to someone, PGP Tray will bring up a dialogue box, showing me that the message will in fact be encrypted to my def