On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:21:25PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:29:39PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that the latest chunk scan optimization diff is committed, it's
> > time to present a malloc feature diff.
> >
> > This diff adds instrumentatio
f ( e/d:d8e fg+ g5&d= e!!
g5&f(ggh(o<
d8;h&g;h%:d8e
ch g ci;i9$f%http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!1K84p1yREQXRDO9YOXH0EfAuoaYkEjm18Q--/article?mid=1
Yahoo!e%f)fe0 d= gfe0.ee3.g f4;f0i+i)c
http://tw
USD2150 Filmadora
Panasonic HDC-MDH1 Sensor CMOS / Full
HD/SD 16:9 4:3 / Salida HDMI / USB / AV / Entrada Para micrófono /
Zoomóptico 23X Filmadoras Sony
DCR-SX65 USD
Due to the great response we have extended this offer another month!
Embroidered Polo or Dress Shirt ONLY $1.95
New Customers Only - Offer Expires May 31st.
Details:
Pick any polo or dress shirt on our website: www.stitchlogo.com or from one of
our paper catalogs.
We will embroider your compa
This is a text part of the message.
It is shown for the users of old-style e-mail clients
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:56:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/05/03 19:51, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> > > On 2011/05/02 22:28, Lawrence Teo wrote:
> > >> The DIOCNATLOOK example program at the end of the pf(4) man page
> >
In the current spirit of making stuff DUID capable i found that
umount(8) was still not so.
Diff makes use of "unrawname()" from fsck/fsutils.[ch]. Not sure if
this is what and how we want it, so no man page changes included so far.
Thoughts? OK's? Manpage diffs? ;-)
/Alexander
Index: Makefile
On 2011/05/03 19:51, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011/05/02 22:28, Lawrence Teo wrote:
> >> The DIOCNATLOOK example program at the end of the pf(4) man page
> >> uses memset(3), but string.h is not included. The following diff
> >> fixes t
USD1160 Canon
EOS 600D T3i Kit 18-55 Tipo
réflex, objetivos intercambiables / Sensor
CMOS de 18,00 MP efectivos / Tamaño sensor
22,30
> > Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:06:21 +0530
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > "recent" macppc machines, power{mac,book}2.1 and onward, also known as
> > "Core99" powermac and after, have an onboard nvram of 8kB (actually 2
> > banks of 8kB).
> >
> > This nvram is used, at least by the
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:06:21 +0530
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> Hi,
>
> "recent" macppc machines, power{mac,book}2.1 and onward, also known as
> "Core99" powermac and after, have an onboard nvram of 8kB (actually 2
> banks of 8kB).
>
> This nvram is used, at least by the Open Firmware, to st
ElvisPresley 30
#1 Hits 2nd To None A Touch Of Platinum
- A Life In Music Aloha From Hawaii
Always On My Mind Artist
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:29:39PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that the latest chunk scan optimization diff is committed, it's
> time to present a malloc feature diff.
>
> This diff adds instrumentation to a MALLOC_STATS enabled malloc.c to
> detect and report memory leaks, includ
Hi,
"recent" macppc machines, power{mac,book}2.1 and onward, also known as
"Core99" powermac and after, have an onboard nvram of 8kB (actually 2
banks of 8kB).
This nvram is used, at least by the Open Firmware, to store its
variables. The following diff is a driver to access the nvram
without cal
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:32:47AM +0200, Gabriel Linder wrote:
> I have an alc device too, and would like to fix it. Starting from
> kevlo's diff I updated it some month ago to compile, and compared
> FreeBSD driver to add some more things, finding some bugs in their
> driver (reported and fixed i
On 05/05/11(Thu) 15:59, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> The following diff adds the possibility to mute the master channel on
> any i2s based card. As a side effect the "mute key" on the keyboard now
> works as expected.
>
> Comments, Ok?
New diff, should fix mixerctl crash with chipsets that don't supp
>> malloc_cache is a power of the, so a bitwise and with malloc_cache - 1
>> is equivalent to modulo malloc_cache.
>
> of two, that is.
>
> Room is reserved for MALLOC_MAXCACHE pointers, but only malloc_cache
> are ever used. So doing a modulo malloc_cache is ok.
Ahh, sorry for that. I was thrown
People running ospfd should better test this diff.
The diff is a start at supporting opaque LSA (type 9, 10 and 11). Those
are used for things like graceful restart. Now even if you don't have
systems emitting such LSA it is important to test the diff to make sure
normal operation is still working
Hi,
Now that the latest chunk scan optimization diff is committed, it's
time to present a malloc feature diff.
This diff adds instrumentation to a MALLOC_STATS enabled malloc.c to
detect and report memory leaks, including the address of the code that
allocated memory that was not freed. With the
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:09:16AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:59:52PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > And by using opendev(3) tunefs can accept disk UID's.
> > >
> > > Any actual tune
On 2011/05/05 11:51, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> I have no idea, but a porter should probably check the distfiles.
It's not used in ports at present. (symon has a SMART stats module
which uses it, but it's only used on NetBSD).
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:59:52PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > And by using opendev(3) tunefs can accept disk UID's.
> >
> > Any actual tunefs(8) guru's out there who can explain what this
> > might break?
> >
> > Inspi
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:59:52PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> And by using opendev(3) tunefs can accept disk UID's.
>
> Any actual tunefs(8) guru's out there who can explain what this
> might break?
>
> Inspired by oga@'s work on atactl.
millert already provided a diff for that, the th
The following diff adds the possibility to mute the master channel on
any i2s based card. As a side effect the "mute key" on the keyboard now
works as expected.
Comments, Ok?
Index: dev/i2s.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/macppc/de
On 04/05/11(Wed) 20:29, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > Speaking of DELAY()... it is implemented using the processor internal
> > > counter register. Is this register impacted by frequency changes? If so,
> > > shouldn't you update the computed ns_per_tick delay() constant?
> >
> > Reading the doc again,
25 matches
Mail list logo
