Hi,
Couple of comments inline.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 03:16:28AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
> This is an attempt to make the ssh-* man pages more exact regarding
> SSH_ASKPASS, when used for ssh-agent key confirmation.
>
> The point I'm making is that the relevant SSH_ASKPASS environment
> va
This is an attempt to make the ssh-* man pages more exact regarding
SSH_ASKPASS, when used for ssh-agent key confirmation.
The point I'm making is that the relevant SSH_ASKPASS environment
variable is not that of ssh-add(1) (apart from when ssh-add is actually
asking for a passphrase).
On a siden
On 07/20/13 15:20, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 20/07/13(Sat) 14:10, Artturi Alm wrote:
Hi,
work-in-progress-quality 'port' to add support for Allwinner A10, tested
on cubieboard only.
Nice work. For what I've seen this port is really similar to the beagle
one. Do you think it's possible to me
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 08:26:56PM +0300, Henri Kemppainen wrote:
> > > I do fear that with some devices your patch will collapse too many
> > > events and make it harder to follow small radius curves.
> >
> > Right, I did not consider this case. If this is a problem, perhaps
> > the code could b
Am 20.07.2013 um 14:20 schrieb Martin Pieuchot :
> On 20/07/13(Sat) 14:10, Artturi Alm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> work-in-progress-quality 'port' to add support for Allwinner A10, tested
>> on cubieboard only.
>
> Nice work. For what I've seen this port is really similar to the beagle
> one. Do you
On 20/07/13(Sat) 14:10, Artturi Alm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> work-in-progress-quality 'port' to add support for Allwinner A10, tested
> on cubieboard only.
Nice work. For what I've seen this port is really similar to the beagle
one. Do you think it's possible to merge your work into this port or is
the
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 07:41:41PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For 64 bit time_t the routing message rmx_expire field has to be
> changed from u_int to int64_t. I will do that after ABI unlock.
>
> I would like to prepare the /sbin/route source for this change.
>
> ok?
I was thinki