On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:42:51AM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 10:46:44AM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> >
> > > Am 05.12.2016 um 23:05 schrieb Bryan Vyhmeister :
> > >
> > > In responding to a post on misc@, I noticed that bioctl(8) uses all sd(4)
> > > devices in the
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 10:46:44AM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
> > Am 05.12.2016 um 23:05 schrieb Bryan Vyhmeister :
> >
> > In responding to a post on misc@, I noticed that bioctl(8) uses all sd(4)
> > devices in the examples sections while softraid(4) uses wd(4) devices
> > for the chunks. Thi
> Am 05.12.2016 um 23:05 schrieb Bryan Vyhmeister :
>
> In responding to a post on misc@, I noticed that bioctl(8) uses all sd(4)
> devices in the examples sections while softraid(4) uses wd(4) devices
> for the chunks. This patch updates softraid.4 to use sd(4) devices as
> well. I have not used
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:49:06AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:02PM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> > In responding to a post on misc@, I noticed that bioctl(8) uses all sd(4)
> > devices in the examples sections while softraid(4) uses wd(4) devices
> > for the chu
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:02PM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> In responding to a post on misc@, I noticed that bioctl(8) uses all sd(4)
> devices in the examples sections while softraid(4) uses wd(4) devices
> for the chunks. This patch updates softraid.4 to use sd(4) devices as
> well. I hav
In responding to a post on misc@, I noticed that bioctl(8) uses all sd(4)
devices in the examples sections while softraid(4) uses wd(4) devices
for the chunks. This patch updates softraid.4 to use sd(4) devices as
well. I have not used a wd(4) device in years and I think it more
confusing to use ex