On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 05:20:16PM +, David Holland wrote:
> The other obvious approach is to add one or more new ptrace operations
> to provide proper/adequate/better support for intercepting system
> calls. This is probably a more useful facility in the long run, and it
> *can* be made leakpr
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:20:16 +
David Holland wrote:
> The other obvious approach is to add one or more new ptrace operations
> to provide proper/adequate/better support for intercepting system
> calls. This is probably a more useful facility in the long run, and it
> *can* be made leakproof,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 05:44:31PM +0100, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:22:17PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 15:31:45 +, David Holland wrote:
> > > > Consequently,
Hi Joerg, hi folks,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:22:17PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 15:31:45 +, David Holland wrote:
> > > Consequently, the changes should be reverted, at least until the
> >
