On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:20:16 +0000 David Holland <dholland-t...@netbsd.org> wrote:
> The other obvious approach is to add one or more new ptrace operations > to provide proper/adequate/better support for intercepting system > calls. This is probably a more useful facility in the long run, and it > *can* be made leakproof, but it'll be more work. Could this also eventually allow systrace-style functionality that'd be safer than the previous implementation? Thanks, -- Matt
