#283: USB 3.0
--+
Reporter: ccui | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords: USB 3.0 | Blocked By:
Blocking:|
Hi,
I made a fresh F17 desktop (gnome3) installation on my box to a real
partition with F17/Alpha/RC4: No problems during install, the system
runs immediately. Applying all available updates.
But there are some flaws:
1. No sound with "00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7
Family
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 21:54 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I was able to fool RC4 into installing on my office machine by
> telling it to use advances sotrage and selecting a drive
> that had no version of Linux on it.
>
> Unfortunately, attempting to mount a nfs share fails
> with a
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Timothy Davis wrote:
>
> Once again grub2 has installed dozens (at least 20) different entries in my
> boot menu. I understand that Fedora is bleeding edge and not for the feint
> of heart
>
> I accept that and have no problem tweaking anything. But come on now! I
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1283/drupal6-6.24-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2144/glibc-2.14.1-6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0752/jetty-6.1.26-7.fc15
h
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0730/jetty-6.1.26-8.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1268/drupal7-7.12-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1709/apr-1.4.6-1.fc16
At the F17 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 17 Alpha release
(RC4) was declared GOLD, and ready for shipment on February 28, 2012.
GOLD is the color of mustard, and, as you know, mustard indicates
progress. A huge thank you to everyone who made this on-time(!!!) Alpha
release possible.
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:04 -0500, Josef Skladanka wrote:
> This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses LiveCD tools to
> transfer the Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as
> expected'.
>
> I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase.
I just realized, this test
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:46:30PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Michal Jaegermann
> wrote:
> > In summary this is deep into a "dancing pig" teritory; no question of
> > dancing well but one marvels that she is dancing at all.
>
> What is your screen resolution?
1
Too many different Linux systems on my office machine to add some random
file to each of them. I'll wait until Anaconda gets over its temper
tantrum.
I was able to install the 64 bit live Xfce to sda11 and grub2.
No problems seen with grub2. yum update fails with a flurry
of 404 errors.
On 0
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 06:55 -0500, Timothy Davis wrote:
> Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> > RC4 installed unhandled exception on simple storage
> devices check.
> > Unfortunately, upload of traceback failed also.
>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:40:18AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 16:35 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>>
>> > This particular one is a 64-bit (albeit quite old) processor:
>> >
>> > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
>> > c
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:40:18AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 16:35 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> > This particular one is a 64-bit (albeit quite old) processor:
> >
> > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> > cpu family : 15
> > model : 5
> > model name : AMD
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2123/glibc-2.15-23.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2187/krb5-1.10-4.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1800/xulrunner-10.0.1-3.fc17
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Timothy Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 08:22 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Timothy Davis wrote:
>> > Once again grub2 has installed dozens (at least 20) different entries in my
>> > boot menu. I understand that Fedora i
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 08:22 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Timothy Davis wrote:
> > Once again grub2 has installed dozens (at least 20) different entries in my
> > boot menu. I understand that Fedora is bleeding edge and not for the feint
> > of heart
> > I acc
On 02/22/2012 10:06 AM, Timothy Davis wrote:
Once again grub2 has installed dozens (at least 20) different entries in
my boot menu. I understand that Fedora is bleeding edge and not for the
feint of heart
I accept that and have no problem tweaking anything. But come on now! I
feel like I should j
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Timothy Davis wrote:
> Once again grub2 has installed dozens (at least 20) different entries in my
> boot menu. I understand that Fedora is bleeding edge and not for the feint
> of heart
> I accept that and have no problem tweaking anything. But come on now! I feel
Once again grub2 has installed dozens (at least 20) different entries in my
boot menu. I understand that Fedora is bleeding edge and not for the feint
of heart
I accept that and have no problem tweaking anything. But come on now! I
feel like I should just rewrite the mkconfig program.
My system is
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 16:35 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> This particular one is a 64-bit (albeit quite old) processor:
>
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> cpu family: 15
> model : 5
> model name: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 142
> stepping : 1
> cpu MHz : 1600.
Kamil Paral redhat.com> writes:
> > QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> > QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla (Alpha)
> > QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk (Alpha)
> > QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
>
> I have tried Alpha RC4 (anaconda 17.11),
>
> Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> > RC4 installed unhandled exception on simple storage devices check.
> > Unfortunately, upload of traceback failed also.
> >
> > RC3 did install on a different computer with just one hard disk.
> Sounds kind of like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
#282: Test Day proposal - ABRT & deduplication service
--+
Reporter: rmarko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked
Compose started at Wed Feb 22 08:15:07 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
> QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla (Alpha)
> QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk (Alpha)
> QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
Test cases updated. However, for "save_traceback_to_bugzilla" we used to have
the opti
> > The new feature is implemented and should be part of the next
> > anaconda release
> (17.9 probably). We just use
> > 'traceback' boot option. Once a new compose with the new anaconda
> > is ready,
> I'll re-write the test cases.
>
> The 'traceback' boot option does NOT appear to be implemente
26 matches
Mail list logo
