Yes, it's definitely possibly your hardware breaks with the new kernel. I'm
using virtualbox so life is easier for me.
I would suggest running a yum update or compiling kernel 3.3rc6 next from
source and see if that helps.
kernel 3.3rc6 should be in the updates-testing repo soon either way.
Dan
#283: USB 3.0
---+---
Reporter: ccui | Owner: hongqing
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords: USB 3.0
Blocked By:
#271: L10N and i18n Test Day
---+---
Reporter: aalam | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocke
#284: Create advisory installation validation test cases for VirtualBox
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Wiki |Version:
Resolution:|
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120305
Next meeting is scheduled for 2012-03-12 at 1600 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
If you have topics you think we should bring up at the meeting, please
add them to the Wiki page at
https
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Ruy,
>
> I was able to upgrade using the DVD from f16 i386 -> f17 i386. I am able
> to login to both Gnome, KDE and XFCE.
>
> Can you give us some more details on the errors you are getting?
>
> Dan
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:30 PM, pringle..
#284: Create advisory installation validation test cases for VirtualBox
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Wiki |Version:
Resolution:|
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120227
Next meeting was scheduled for 2012-03-05 at 1600 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
TOPIC: Fedora 17 Alpha wrap-up and Beta prep
==
Ruy,
I was able to upgrade using the DVD from f16 i386 -> f17 i386. I am able to
login to both Gnome, KDE and XFCE.
Can you give us some more details on the errors you are getting?
Dan
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:30 PM, pringle...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Adam Willia
#284: Create advisory installation validation test cases for VirtualBox
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Wiki |Version:
Resolution:|
#271: L10N and i18n Test Day
---+---
Reporter: aalam | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocke
#256: Add EFI data to installation / base results matrices
--+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Wiki |Vers
Hey, folks. I've drafted up my proposal for adding EFI testing to the
installation matrix here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Fedora_17_Install_Results_Template
Compare to the current:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_17_Install_Results_Template
It's fairly strai
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 15:20 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > Ruy,
> >
> > Did you install using preupgrade or the DVD?
> >
> > I used preupgrade and got a kernel panic.
>
> preupgrade is highly likely to be completely borked at present, to my
>
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 15:20 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Ruy,
>
> Did you install using preupgrade or the DVD?
>
> I used preupgrade and got a kernel panic.
preupgrade is highly likely to be completely borked at present, to my
knowledge no attempt has been made to set up preupgrade to work for f17
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 05:10 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> We have these two test cases:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Install_to_Current_KVM
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Install_to_Previous_KVM
>
> In the test results matrix [1] they are split according to the
> arc
#284: Create advisory installation validation test cases for VirtualBox
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Wiki |Version:
Resolution:|
#284: Create advisory installation validation test cases for VirtualBox
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Wiki |Version:
Resolution:|
Ruy,
Did you install using preupgrade or the DVD?
I used preupgrade and got a kernel panic.
Dan
On Mar 5, 2012 1:31 PM, "Dan Mashal" wrote:
> Ruy,
>
> I will be testing that right now and will get back to you shortly.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM, pringle...@gmail.com
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 13:33 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I noticed a new initrd.img in the pxeboot directory
> so I copied it anc vmlinuz to my tftpd directory.
> It still fails looking for its root.
>
> I presume this bug will be a beta blocker.
Not necessarily, no. But it's not
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 14:36 +0530, RT User wrote:
> Thanks Adam!
>
> # livecd-iso-to-disk --efi --format ...
>
> did the trick. However I rant into another issue. The USB boots fine
> to live environment. Install to HDD proceeds until the last step and
> then fails at bootloader install (
On Thursday 01 March 2012 11:48:02 Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
> anybody have any luck with dropbox on F17 x86_64? It's not showing up in
> the panel, but is in the applications->internet menu. When clicked, it
> tries to install, but fails.
Do you see any SELinux denials?
Dropbox people managed (a
Ruy,
I will be testing that right now and will get back to you shortly.
Thanks,
Dan
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM, pringle...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
>> Hi Ruy,
>>
>> Are you using i386 or amd64 version of Fedora17?
>>
>> How did you upgrade?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Hi Ruy,
>
> Are you using i386 or amd64 version of Fedora17?
>
> How did you upgrade? Please provide us with the steps to reproduce the
> problem.
>
> I am about to do an upgrade on a Fedora 16 i386 host right now for testing
> purposes and woul
Hi Ruy,
Are you using i386 or amd64 version of Fedora17?
How did you upgrade? Please provide us with the steps to reproduce the
problem.
I am about to do an upgrade on a Fedora 16 i386 host right now for testing
purposes and would appreciate this information.
Thanks,
Dan
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at
Hi, i upgrade to fedora 17 from fedora 16 with no issues. I try to login to
Gnome Shell but the warning that say Oh no! and ask to logout show up. The
funny thing was that in my setup (dual monitors) the rest of the login
process continue (in one monitor the warning in the other the rest of stuff
t
I usually run the blocker review meetings but I'm not going to be
around this Friday and need someone else to run the meeting.
The process is pretty simple, following the blocker bug meeting SOP on
the wiki [1]. You just need to tally votes and run meetbot to change
topics and create #agreed state
Fedora l10n Test Day
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ani Peter
Date: Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:03 PM
Subject: L10N Desktop testing day for Fedora 17 - 12/03/07
To: Fedora Translation Project List ,
i...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello everyone,
We will have the L10N Test day for Fedora
Compose started at Mon Mar 5 08:15:08 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
As my understanding, the i386 and x86_64 always refer to the guest architecture.
Hongqing
- Original Message -
> From: "Kamil Paral"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Monday, March 5, 2012 6:10:17 PM
> Subject: KVM host/guest test cases and architec
We have these two test cases:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Install_to_Current_KVM
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Install_to_Previous_KVM
In the test results matrix [1] they are split according to the architecture.
Now, does it talk about HOST architecture or GUEST archi
31 matches
Mail list logo