Re: Problem booting/install Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Alpha.iso

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: When I tryed to boot the CD on HP Compaq DC5850 it just restart again and again (looping). On the Dell Dimension 3100 it just stoped displaying: ISOLINUX 6.02 There was no problem making netinstall on VM in KVM/qemu.

Installing nvidia driver on Fedora 21 crashes my system

2014-09-30 Thread Napoleon Quashie
I have been using Fedora 21 since the alpha release and overall it has worked wonderfully (it has never one crashed and I use it every day), even to the extent of noticing a reduction in the memory consumed and processor usage when I have all my usual application up and running. One thing though

Re: Installing nvidia driver on Fedora 21 crashes my system

2014-09-30 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
On 09/30/2014 03:38 AM, Napoleon Quashie wrote: I have been using Fedora 21 since the alpha release and overall it has worked wonderfully (it has never one crashed and I use it every day), even to the extent of noticing a reduction in the memory consumed and processor usage when I have all my

Re: Installing nvidia driver on Fedora 21 crashes my system

2014-09-30 Thread Mike Ruckman
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:38:12AM +0100, Napoleon Quashie wrote: I have been using Fedora 21 since the alpha release and overall it has worked wonderfully (it has never one crashed and I use it every day), even to the extent of noticing a reduction in the memory consumed and processor usage

Re: Installing nvidia driver on Fedora 21 crashes my system

2014-09-30 Thread Reynold
On 09/30/2014 09:24 AM, Mike Ruckman wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:38:12AM +0100, Napoleon Quashie wrote: I have been using Fedora 21 since the alpha release and overall it has worked wonderfully (it has never one crashed and I use it every day), even to the extent of noticing a reduction

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers policy. [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the policy.) That sounds

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers policy. [1] (This is already

Re: Problem booting/install Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Alpha.iso

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: When I tryed to boot the CD on HP Compaq DC5850 it just restart again and again (looping). On the Dell Dimension 3100 it just stoped displaying: ISOLINUX 6.02

Re: Problem booting/install Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Alpha.iso

2014-09-30 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:20:58 -0700 Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: When I tryed to boot the CD on HP

Re: Yumex

2014-09-30 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Yumex should work fine in F21, could be a problem with Policykit, please make a bugzilla report and I will help you track down the issue. My plan is to replace yumex 3.0.x, with the 4.x version based on dnf at F22, http://www.yumex.dk/2014/09/yum-extender-407-released-dnf.html Tim On Tue, Sep

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: That sounds workable, so long as someone's actually making sure we *do* comply with those. Has anyone checked that yet? I'd rather not throw it in the criteria and then have to fudge it immediately :) I don't think all apps are

Re: Proposing new dual booting release criteria

2014-09-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sep 29, 2014, at 3:32 AM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: 1. The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which can boot into both Windows and Fedora. This one is simply dropping the

F-21 Branched report: 20140930 changes

2014-09-30 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Sep 30 16:27:39 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires

rawhide report: 20140930 changes

2014-09-30 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Sep 30 17:31:06 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [Agda] ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so

Validation results categories: just have Alpha, Beta and Final?

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks. So as I've been playing with relval, I've been wondering why we have 'TC' and 'RC' results page categories. That is, we have a top-level 'Test Results' category, then we have a category for each release which is a member of that category (e.g. Category:Fedora_20_Test_Results ) , and

Re: Proposed Server release criteria for F21 Beta and Final

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 17:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, folks. So, I drew up a rough draft of the Server release criteria for Beta and Final as I suggest they might be. We could kick it around at tomorrow's meeting if desired. Here we go: So, here's the second draft of the Beta criteria,

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers policy. [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the policy.) So Beta TC1

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Appearance is something we'd want to enforce if it were actually done, but I get the impression the Qt variant of Adwaita isn't actually written yet. There's no need for such a thing. Qt renders apps with

Re: Validation results categories: just have Alpha, Beta and Final?

2014-09-30 Thread Mike Ruckman
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:29:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, folks. So as I've been playing with relval, I've been wondering why we have 'TC' and 'RC' results page categories. That is, we have a top-level 'Test Results' category, then we have a category for each release which is a

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2014-09-30 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 152 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20 46 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20 21

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2014-09-30 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 18 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10766/mod_gnutls-0.5.10-13.fc21 18 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10767/squid-3.4.7-2.fc21 3

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2014-09-30 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 340 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 152 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 103