On Út, 2012-03-13 at 22:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Ack! Since we had a solid consensus on the meeting I think we should
> just go ahead and put this in the Beta criteria.
The new criterion is right on the place. So from now, non-functional
serial console interface is beta (and final) b
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 08:54 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
> because no one had objections against it and we decided on blocker bug
> meeting, that serial console is blocker, I propose to add criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to complete an installation using the serial
> console int
On St, 2012-03-07 at 18:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 08:21 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
> > > criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion
> > > on
> > > blocker bug meeting [
Serial is definitely needed and is a beta blocker. I am with Adam.
Dan
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 08:21 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
> > > criterion, I'd like to start di
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 08:21 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
> > criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion
> > on
> > blocker bug meeting [1] (17:40) and it didn't end with unanimous
> > decision. So, let t
> Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
> criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion
> on
> blocker bug meeting [1] (17:40) and it didn't end with unanimous
> decision. So, let the flame war begin. Do you want serial interface
> in
> beta cri
Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion on
blocker bug meeting [1] (17:40) and it didn't end with unanimous
decision. So, let the flame war begin. Do you want serial interface in
beta criterion? I aske
Because nobody had any objections, I've added new criterion to [1] and
I've changed release level of [2] to final.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Final_Release_Criteria
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Cmdline
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 09:55 -0800,
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:39 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new final criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
> supported interfaces"
>
> Serial port is covered by this one. As I've seen some discussion on
> anaconda-devel list, it's still support
I forgot to mention that if this criterion will be accepted, we should
move test case [2] to final release level.
And I forgot to give a link to anaconda-devel thread about supported
interfaces [1]
[1]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2012-January/msg00207.html
[2]
https://fedo
10 matches
Mail list logo