On Sep 11, 2004, at 10:19 AM, William McKee wrote:
I'm liking Module::Build more and more ;).
Me, too.
Scroll down a bit more to see the Build.PL example I added.
Oops, I hadn't realized that you updated that page after you released
Apache::TestMB. Thanks for your work on integrating
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 04:07:35PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> >I'm getting an error when trying to use Stas' template[1] with your
> >module. Basically, the filter_args() method is generating an error. I
> >am
> >calling it like this:
> >
> >
On Sep 10, 2004, at 3:00 PM, William McKee wrote:
I'm getting an error when trying to use Stas' template[1] with your
module. Basically, the filter_args() method is generating an error. I
am
calling it like this:
Apache::TestMB::filter_args();
You don't need to do that. Apache:
Hi David,
I'm getting an error when trying to use Stas' template[1] with your
module. Basically, the filter_args() method is generating an error. I am
calling it like this:
Apache::TestMB::filter_args();
My build seems to work fine with this method commented out. However, I'
On Jul 6, 2004, at 12:56 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Committed, should there be a log in Changes?
Yep, thanks.
David
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 5, 2004, at 11:09 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
Can't locate object method "generate_script" via package
"Apache::TestMB" at Build.PL line 62.
Oh, sorry, it's generate_test_script().
And I have no idea why it is, since it's generate_scr
On Jul 5, 2004, at 11:53 AM, William McKee wrote:
OK, that worked. Why is it named differently from the format used by
Apache::TestMM? Nevermind, I see your follow-up message. That works for
me!
Probably do to some overly-aggressive find and replace or something.
Sorry about that!
David
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 11:09:47AM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> >When I try running generate_smoke, I get the following output:
Now I'm doing it! That should have been generate_script.
> Oh, sorry, it's generate_test_script().
OK, that worked. Why is it named differently from the format used b
On Jul 5, 2004, at 11:09 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
Can't locate object method "generate_script" via package
"Apache::TestMB" at Build.PL line 62.
Oh, sorry, it's generate_test_script().
And I have no idea why it is, since it's generate_script in the other
A::
cript.
Yeah, I was just following the example in the synopsis of the
Module::Build docs. Either is fine with me, too. What do others prefer?
You can use Apache::TestMB->generate_script, however; will that work?
When I try running generate_smoke, I get the following output:
Can't l
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:51:32AM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> Oh, quite right. My fault. This patch fixes the docs:
>
> --- TestMB.pm.~1.2.~ Fri Jun 25 18:55:53 2004
> +++ TestMB.pm Fri Jul 2 09:49:40 2004
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
>my $build_pkg = eval { requ
On Jul 2, 2004, at 9:34 AM, William McKee wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry about that false start. Lemme try this again! As I was saying,
David, thanks for adding support for Module::Build. I'm trying to
replace one of my existing projects using the Apache::TestMB module. It
works fine unless I try
On Jul 2, 2004, at 9:19 AM, William McKee wrote:
Thanks for your efforts in adding support
Glad it works for you!
This reminds me:
--- Test.pm.~1.84.~ Fri Jun 25 18:55:53 2004
+++ Test.pm Fri Jul 2 09:27:18 2004
@@ -807,7 +807,8 @@
exports a number of useful functions for sending request to the
Hi all,
Sorry about that false start. Lemme try this again! As I was saying,
David, thanks for adding support for Module::Build. I'm trying to
replace one of my existing projects using the Apache::TestMB module. It
works fine unless I try to do something with the return value from the
exa
Hi David,
Thanks for your efforts in adding support
--
Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com
David Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>> sure, I'll try to wrap up a candidate tomorrow.
>
>
> Sweet, thanks!
ok, I did this a few hours ago, but the announcement email hasn't made it
through.
testing...
--Geoff
On Jun 23, 2004, at 10:02 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't
know how to test it. Thanks David.
Here's a quick documentation patch, essentially, for the unimplemented
cmodules actions:
--- lib/Apache/TestMB.pm.~1.1.~ Wed Jun 23 09:51:15 200
On Jun 23, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
sure, I'll try to wrap up a candidate tomorrow.
Sweet, thanks!
David
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
Geoff, if you have no objections, can you handle this release? I'm on
the road and not the most suitable person to do the release at the moment.
sure, I'll try to wrap up a candidate tomorrow.
Thanks Geoff!
--
Stas Bekman wrote:
> David Wheeler wrote:
>
>> On Jun 23, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>> Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't
>>> know how to test it. Thanks David.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cool, thanks. What do you need to be able to feel comfortable/ready to
>> r
On Jun 23, 2004, at 9:19 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
As I mentioned I don't know how to test it, so if you think it's good,
then nothing stops us from doing that. We ought to post a release
candidate and 24 later go on CPAN.
That works for me. As I said, I'll release
MasonX::Interp::WithCallbacks
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 23, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't
know how to test it. Thanks David.
Cool, thanks. What do you need to be able to feel comfortable/ready to
release it?
As I mentioned I don't know how to test i
On Jun 23, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't
know how to test it. Thanks David.
Cool, thanks. What do you need to be able to feel comfortable/ready to
release it?
It's a well kept secret :) existing committers need to vote fi
David Wheeler wrote:
Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't know how
to test it. Thanks David.
Moreover, I think it's time to give you commit access to A-T if you
wish to. Do you have an account at apache.org?
I don't. How do I get one? A quick look around www.apach
Ken Williams wrote:
On Jun 22, 2004, at 5:15 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
I figured. I like my style, too (mainly just cperl-mode style). ;-)
pretty much the same here, cperl-mode too :)
For HTML::Mason we found it helpful to add the following as the first
line of source files:
#
On Jun 22, 2004, at 5:15 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
I figured. I like my style, too (mainly just cperl-mode style). ;-)
pretty much the same here, cperl-mode too :)
For HTML::Mason we found it helpful to add the following as the first
line of source files:
# -*- cperl-indent-leve
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 22, 2004, at 7:32 AM, Randy Kobes wrote:
Right now the Makefile is generated by methods within
Apache/TestConfigC.pm, which generally consists of calling
the apxs utility to compile the module (as well as
implementing a 'clean' t
On Jun 22, 2004, at 3:34 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
I doubt so. Just make it die with the appropriate message, so that if
someone needs it they will know that it'll be added in the future.
Okay, done.
Uh, and here it is.
Regards,
David
hat +1 and thank you,
David.
I've tried it with MasonX::Interp::WithCallbacks, which I will release
with the Build.PL as soon as Apache::Test is released with
Apache::TestMB.
Moreover, I think it's time to give you commit access to A-T if you
wish to. Do you have an account at
ill always log things, whereas debug() won't. So for example in your
case you could use the notice() func. Apache::TestTrace really mimicks
the LogLevel from Apache.
Are you suggesting that it be used inside Apache::TestMB? There's only
one print statement, in generate_script(), and there I
r
changes the default, traces:
emerg alert crit error warning notice info
will always log things, whereas debug() won't. So for example in your
case you could use the notice() func. Apache::TestTrace really mimicks
the LogLevel from Apache.
Are you suggesting that it be used inside Apache::Test
David Wheeler wrote:
How are you going to avoid that? I mean your users need to be able to
run certain features of Apache-Test, which are beyond 'make test'. May
be you want to always create t/TEST, but run 'make test' without
invoking t/TEST?
I meant that I wanted to avoid dealing with it. ;-)
On Jun 22, 2004, at 12:19 PM, Randy Kobes wrote:
Sure, it should be relatively straightforward ... But I'd
like to get, especially, Stas' opinion on this - adding this
in will necessarily introduce a few branches in the
Apache/TestConfigC.pm code related to, first of all, whether
to write a Makefil
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, David Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2004, at 7:32 AM, Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> > Right now the Makefile is generated by methods within
> > Apache/TestConfigC.pm, which generally consists of calling
> > the apxs utility to compile the module (as well as
> > implementing a 'clean' t
On Jun 22, 2004, at 11:05 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
ah, yes, it tries to figure out where it is and move out of t/, as per
your request earlier. Feel free to suggest a way to work it out. That
particular code could be made into a subclassable method, which your
subclass could implement differently.
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 22, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Absolutely. It's really just:
MyTest->new->run(@ARGV);
where MyTest is a subclass of Apache::TestRunPerl
I tried that, but it didn't work. I'm not sure why. The first problem
was this code:
$0 = File::Spec->rel2abs($0);
Oops, sorry for the dupe.
David
On Jun 22, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Absolutely. It's really just:
MyTest->new->run(@ARGV);
where MyTest is a subclass of Apache::TestRunPerl
I tried that, but it didn't work. I'm not sure why. The first problem
was this code:
$0 = File::Spec->rel2abs($0);
if (-e $0) {
On Jun 22, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Absolutely. It's really just:
MyTest->new->run(@ARGV);
where MyTest is a subclass of Apache::TestRunPerl
I tried that, but it didn't work. I'm not sure why. The first problem
was this code:
$0 = File::Spec->rel2abs($0);
if (-e $0) {
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 21, 2004, at 6:12 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Here's a new subclass for Module::Build, Apache::TestMB, which allows
modules that use Module::Build to run tests using Apache::Test.
Let me make a few comments on my "XXX" comments in the source code, and
a
On Jun 22, 2004, at 7:32 AM, Randy Kobes wrote:
Right now the Makefile is generated by methods within
Apache/TestConfigC.pm, which generally consists of calling
the apxs utility to compile the module (as well as
implementing a 'clean' target). In principle I think this
could be done via Module::Bui
On Jun 22, 2004, at 6:23 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
./Build help should work already. ./Build help $newaction should work
automatically if you add documentation for each action - it searches
for docs using the regex /^=item\s+\Q$action\E\b/ .
Ah, I had "=item C". I'll remove the C<>.
Thanks,
David
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, David Wheeler wrote:
[ ... ]
> * This isn't commented in the code I sent you, but I'll
> note it: I didn't implement "cmodules" or "cmodules_clean"
> actions. They appear simple, but they seem to depend on
> `make` rather than Module::Build. Stas, are these just
> that simple
On Jun 22, 2004, at 12:18 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
* Ken, how do I add code so that ./Build help lists the new actions,
and ./Build help $new_action prints out some documentation for the
action?
./Build help should work already. ./Build help $newaction should work
automatically if you add docu
On Jun 21, 2004, at 6:12 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Here's a new subclass for Module::Build, Apache::TestMB, which allows
modules that use Module::Build to run tests using Apache::Test.
Let me make a few comments on my "XXX" comments in the source code, and
aske a couple of q
On Jun 21, 2004, at 8:29 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
I see - so the author would design their tests so they could be run
either with or without a live server? I'm guessing many authors would
want to require a live server, and thus rely on Apache::TestMB.
Most module authors design their tes
On Jun 21, 2004, at 8:12 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Hi All,
Here's a new subclass for Module::Build, Apache::TestMB, which allows
modules that use Module::Build to run tests using Apache::Test. My
assumption is that it would be distributed with Apache::Test;
therefore its use is something
Hi All,
Here's a new subclass for Module::Build, Apache::TestMB, which allows
modules that use Module::Build to run tests using Apache::Test. My
assumption is that it would be distributed with Apache::Test; therefore
its use is something like this:
use Module::Build;
my $build_pkg =
48 matches
Mail list logo
