Well said and totally agree (well, everybody is great), and any slow down
of good information and conversation is to me the worst thing that can
happen in a community.
I just want to clearly state that if I'm not showing appreciation, not
adopting something, or not engaging: I'm just not ready to
Hi Charlie,
You are great and I learn from you and what you publish in the forum!
There is no need to apologize as we discussed something technically! and
many times disagreement helps to improve things!
We have a Perdian proverb: differences make beauty!
So, I appreciate your efforts and
Hey, I totally agree with you, and if I sound unappreciative, then I
totally apologize. I do very much appreciate.
Each one of us learns within the confines of our own abilities, learning by
maximizing those things that play to our strengths and minimizing those
things that emphasize our
Hi Tones
Thank you for your solution! That solution in TW-Scripts actually belongs
to Eric and based on the question and answer I kept the
original one! Yes, we can improve or add another one with your name and
based on this thread!
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 4:02 AM TW Tones
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:34 AM Charlie Veniot wrote:
> The simplest combo of filters and transclusions? That could be wildly
> different for each person.
>
> For each person, It would be what is easiest to understand and maintain
> for that person, based on each person's intertwingled way of
Mohammad,
As a community we are so grateful for your publishing and documentation.
Shiraz as an example is a substantial resource.
I would like to help, extend your great content a little further and make
it even more useful If I can so humbly suggest a few things
For example I looked at
The simplest combo of filters and transclusions? That could be wildly
different for each person.
For each person, It would be what is easiest to understand and maintain for
that person, based on each person's intertwingled way of seeing things,
based on each person's experiences (how he/she
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:36 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
> *That is definitely short and sweet (elegant !).* Thanks for posting!
> Great to have in one's toolkit (i.e. knowledge of listops, or simply
> availability of excellent pre-canned solutions to focus on bigger
> problems), so into my
*That is definitely short and sweet (elegant !).* Thanks for posting!
Great to have in one's toolkit (i.e. knowledge of listops, or simply
availability of excellent pre-canned solutions to focus on bigger
problems), so into my back-pocket for delving into someday it all goes.
I'm on a
It's a bit complicated! but it works!
have a look at TW-Scripts for example
https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
> Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular
Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance I'm
working with I've setup with only single-word tags.
So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with words
separated by spaces.
To handle any multi-word tag with spaces between the words:
\define
Does this work if you want to add [[newTag from code]]?
Or if the tiddlers already have a tag with space in the title?
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:01 AM Charlie Veniot wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to apply
> tag changes
G'day,
I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to apply tag
changes to batches of tiddlers.
In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
\define doIt()
<$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
<$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
13 matches
Mail list logo
