On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:08:21 -0500
> DRC wrote:
>
> > Yuck! I am really averse to setting flags specific to building vnc.so
> > when most people won't be building it. I'm not sure if I understand how
> > the new system differs fro
On 8/22/11 7:36 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> AFAICT libtool used -fPIC by default for the convenience stuff (i.e.
> noinst_*). I initially intended to add a knob for it, but I changed my
> mind as PIC is basically harmless on x86_64 (AFAIK). In other words,
> since the stuff I committed should do the
On 8/22/11 7:36 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> AFAICT libtool used -fPIC by default for the convenience stuff (i.e.
> noinst_*). I initially intended to add a knob for it, but I changed my
> mind as PIC is basically harmless on x86_64 (AFAIK). In other words,
> since the stuff I committed should do the
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:08:21 -0500
DRC wrote:
> Yuck! I am really averse to setting flags specific to building vnc.so
> when most people won't be building it. I'm not sure if I understand how
> the new system differs from the old in this respect. Didn't you have to
> specify --with-pic to get
Yuck! I am really averse to setting flags specific to building vnc.so
when most people won't be building it. I'm not sure if I understand how
the new system differs from the old in this respect. Didn't you have to
specify --with-pic to get PIC code under autotools? Can't we do the
same thing he