cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/generators StaticInterceptor.java

billbarker2002/06/22 20:32:31 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/generators StaticInterceptor.java Log: Experimental support for 2.3 style mapped-welcome files. This of off be default, and probably uses too many recorces if you have more than a

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : benchmarks

"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with Remy that any single benchmark suite isn't going to tell you how > your particular web-app will perform. For sure in a web-app there are way too many variables to consider... The only thing, though, that we have to measure is not "that" dif

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0

"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> As far as I would like to see WARP and its future development, it'll >> probably end up following a different container architecture. The >> extenization of the HTTP stack from the core of the container brings some >> advanta

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : benchmarks

- Original Message - From: "Christopher K. St. John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : benchmarks > Bill Barker wrote: > > > > I agree with Remy > > that any single benchmark suite isn't going t

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0

"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > >> Tomcat 5 isn't some sort of generic server framework, it's >> the reference implementation for the 2.4 spec. The spec is >> central. >> > > Servlet 2.4 will probably go to public

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : #2 Tradeoffs

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have no idea what number to put in the proposal. As fast as > 3.3 ? Faster than resin ? It is not _that_ hard... Pier (who will comment about Tomcat 5 in August) -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of differe

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0

- Original Message - From: "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 7:22 AM Subject: Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 > -1 At this time for starting work on Tomcat 5 (jakarta-tomcat-5) > How about if the proposa

Re: Jasper2: serious problem with tag declarations

Costin, > How do we deal with nested tags of different type ? I don't have > a test case, but I assume someone may have a NESTED tag > 'foo' in 2 different tags, with different declared types ( String and > Integer ). The current generator seems to not create { }, > and I'm not sure how this

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java

cks 2002/06/21 16:41:16 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java Log: Ensure COMMIT action gets called during CLOSE Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/JkCoyoteHandler.java Index: Jk

Re: Jasper2: serious problem with tag declarations

Costin, > > If those variable declaration problems are fixed, I'll release a new > > 4.1.6 milestone as soon as I can fix the JNDI problems. > > Not yet... > > I attached the failed jsp. > > Costin > > [...] > > <%@ page language="java

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > Tomcat 5 isn't some sort of generic server framework, it's > the reference implementation for the 2.4 spec. The spec is > central. > Servlet 2.4 will probably go to public draft pretty soon, so you'll be able to see for yourself -- but I

RE: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0

I keep having that feeling you don't even know what Avalon is. You just "don't like them" or something like that. Did you consider you could have something to learn "from them"? Just asking! Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c

jfclere 2002/06/22 09:57:54 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c Log: Typo Submitted by: Ian Darwin ian at darwinsys.com Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c Index: jk_worker_lb.c =

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler TldLocationsCache.java

jfclere 2002/06/22 09:47:55 Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler TldLocationsCache.java Log: Prevent nullpointerexception when wrong configuration. Submitted by: Ian Darwin ian at darwinsys.com Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +4 -

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config connectors.xml project.xml

jfclere 2002/06/22 09:19:46 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config project.xml Added: webapps/tomcat-docs/config connectors.xml Log: Add some general information about the jakarta-tomcat-connectors. Submitted by: Ian Darwin, ian at darwinsys.com Revision ChangesPath

AW: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : #3 Straw Man

Hi, > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Samstag, 22. Juni 2002 06:32 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : #3 Straw Man > > > Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > > > Proposal in General: > > > > The proposal is

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : benchmarks

Bill Barker wrote: > > I agree with Remy > that any single benchmark suite isn't going to tell you how your particular > web-app will perform. > Bill, Actually, I agree, but this isn't what that is :-) There's a difference between: a) Benchmarks for users that compare the performance of

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper Constants.java

jfclere 2002/06/22 03:19:04 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper Constants.java Log: "Typo" Submitted by: Ian Darwin, ian at darwinsys.com Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/Constants.java I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9931] - Base64 decoder chokes on a whitespace

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9931] - Base64 decoder chokes on a whitespace

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] Tyrex 1.0 w/ Tomcat

Remy Maucherat wrote: > > For the transaction stuff to work properly, don't you need a valve also > to bind/unbind the Tyrex context ? Hmm, not sure exactly what you mean here (sorry :-). I think you are referring to the fact that the transaction is bound to the current thread, and what if the

Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : #3 Straw Man

Bill Barker wrote: > Firstly, let me add my +1 to the proposal. tomcat-dev could use more > warm-and-fuzzies. ;-) Thanks :) >>I have been following the discussion regarding the Tomcat 5 proposal. >> >>I have some general comments. >> >>Improve Performance Goal: >> >>I agree with Chritopher that