DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34765] - NullPointerException thrown by org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolableConnectionFactory

2005-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34765. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

2005-05-06 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34771] New: - Unable to set maxHttpHeaderSize

2005-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34693] - Tomcat infinite wait on noised network

2005-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34693. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34693] - Tomcat infinite wait on noised network

2005-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34693. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31132] - missing

2005-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31132. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-06 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, It's been a week since 1.2.11 has been tagged and released. Because of bug in wc_close, and sice no other bugs have been reported for a week, I plan to tag the 1.2.12 tomorrow morning, 10:00 GMT. Any objections? Regards, Mladen.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c

2005-05-06 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/05/06 06:49:32 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c Log: If tomcat closes the connection after sending initial request, do not log that as error, because probably the 'secret' has been rejected. Revision ChangesPath 1.108 +14 -6

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c

2005-05-06 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/05/06 06:59:34 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c Log: No need to check the proto because it can only be ajp13 or ajp14, when the worker is created. Revision ChangesPath 1.109 +1 -7

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-06 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, It's been a week since 1.2.11 has been tagged and released. Because of bug in wc_close, and sice no other bugs have been reported for a week, I plan to tag the 1.2.12 tomorrow morning, 10:00 GMT. Any objections? It seems a lot of people are on holidays in Europe. Regards,

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-06 Thread Mladen Turk
jean-frederic clere wrote: It's been a week since 1.2.11 has been tagged and released. It seems a lot of people are on holidays in Europe. Well, we'll have a week for the vote anyhow, so I hope the holidays won't last for the entire week ;) Regards, Mladen.

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 07:31 AM 5/6/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, It's been a week since 1.2.11 has been tagged and released. Because of bug in wc_close, and sice no other bugs have been reported for a week, I plan to tag the 1.2.12 tomorrow morning, 10:00 GMT. Any objections? Yes, one. What's the rush? One week

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-06 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi Mladen, yersterday I fix the stopped flag bug. In some case the stopped flag was ignored. I test one case that is not well handled: Configure only one disabled lb worker and requests without session id was handled. Hups! I think the special case only one worker at

Building Tomcat on Windows XP

2005-05-06 Thread Andrew Tomazos
I am trying to build tomcat on Windows XP (Build 2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519 Service Pack 2). I downloaded and installed the latest J2SE 1.5 from java.sun.com. I downloaded and installed the latest Ant 1.6.3. I downloaded and unpacked jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-src. I cd into that directory and

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-06 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Any objections? Yes, one. What's the rush? One week is not enough time for folks to really stress 1.2.11, and this sure looks to me, from the pace of supposedly stable releases, as though mod_jk has become much less trustworthy, and much more suspect, for a stable

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24897] - Getting IOException when line length exceeds 4096

2005-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24897. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34790] New: - Build Failure

2005-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34790. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34790] - Build Failure

2005-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34790. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-06 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hey, I thing we are ready to build a release. The 1.2.11 have little bugs but was stable and now the bug fix 1.2.12 coming soon. I have test a couple of weeks the cvs head and thing it is a good release. A lot of people waiting for it. Thats my problem :-) Peter Mladen Turk schrieb: William A.