RE: Tomcat 4.1.30 ThreadPool.adjustLimits

2004-08-24 Thread jblayer
Yoav, Thanks for the + feedback. Apologies for response delay - I'm digest only and also had wicked work backlog past couple weeks. Will submit a Bugzillia item as requested. Additional questions seem relevant prior to that (in the "be careful what you ask for..." department ;-). With the ou

Tomcat 4.1.30 ThreadPool.adjustLimits

2004-08-03 Thread jblayer
I have several questions that apparently center around the org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool class contained in the tomcat-util.jar file included in the Tomcat V4.1.30 distribution. Background: Using V4.1.30 in a standalone, relatively minimal configuration with the Coyote HTTP/1.1 C

Re: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-26 Thread jblayer
The second observation: two requests to the same servlet always handled serially. Tomcat normally creates one instance of a servlet for every declaration in web.xml. The exception is SingleThreadModel (deprecated, don't use this) servlets. There's no provision in tomcat to create more instanc

Re: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-26 Thread jblayer
Shapira, Yoav writes: I think your testing, servlets, configuration is all fine. The maxProcessors-1 observation is something I've noticed in the past, but as you say I don't think many people care because they deal with ~75 maxProcessors (the default value). Thanks - glad to know I'm not off in

RE: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-25 Thread jblayer
Yoav, Thanks for the quick reply... Create a servlet that takes a long time to process, so you can easily observe the connections. Then make sure you make two concurrent requests to that servlet, and that the servlet's HTML output doesn't contain images, CSS references, or any other entities w

TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-24 Thread jblayer
y, no web pages, JSP, etc. Limiting concurrent connection count to relatively low numbers due to resource constraints on many of these platforms. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Regards, jblayer - To unsubscribe, e-mai