> > Sounds like NAV may have returned some false
> > positives. The only
> > "virus-like" content I would expect inside a plain
> > HTML doc would be
> > rogue JavaScript.
>
> Indeed. I looked at the HTML page myself - it's
> unaltered, and there's nothing rogue in there that I
> can see.
Links
> Sounds like NAV may have returned some false
> positives. The only
> "virus-like" content I would expect inside a plain
> HTML doc would be
> rogue JavaScript.
Indeed. I looked at the HTML page myself - it's
unaltered, and there's nothing rogue in there that I
can see.
>
> Perhaps you could
7;ve found
McAfee is better to run for JSP/Servlet containers & App
Servers than Norton.
Not a bash on Norton, I love it for home use.
-Original Message-
From: QM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 1:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Norton AntiViru
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:46:47PM -0700, Michael Duffy wrote:
: One of the corp IT server admins just called to tell
: me that the server is "riddled" with viruses,
: according to Norton Antivirus. One of the bugged
: files is TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/ROOT/index.html, which is
: dated 8-Oct-2002. The
I have Tomcat 4.0.6 installed on a Windows 2000 server
in our data center.
One of the corp IT server admins just called to tell
me that the server is "riddled" with viruses,
according to Norton Antivirus. One of the bugged
files is TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/ROOT/index.html, which is
dated 8-Oct-2002.