What bothers me from this story is that we all become websdr user
suspects.Especially those of us with increased RX capabilities.Agelos-SV3RF
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
The communication act of 1934 has be 'amended', changed, whatever a few years
back by congress. I think it was on behalf of the NSA and CIA or homeland
security. (always hated that 'homeland security' name. It sounds too much like
'for the Fatherland' for me). And the cellphone companies. You ca
E31A was quite good copy here this morning when I was on around my sunrise
1915z and still audible 20 minutes later.
I'm sure a QSO will be quite impossible with their proximity to Europe. Some
quite good signals in the pileup too.
73 es GL,
Luke VK3HJ
_
Topband Reflector
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:17:41 -0500
From: "Joe Giacobello, K2XX"
To: a Topband COL
Cc: VE6WZ_Steve , Ron Spencer
, k...@dxer.com
Subject: Topband: Fwd: Re: VU2GSM webSDR use: A Clarification
http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 22:41:05 +0800
From: Jeff Blaine
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: sdrWEB not going in my log
http://www.contesting.com/_topband
I think we are all losing sight of one important fact: the “rules” everyone
seems to speaking about are ARRL rules...the only “rules” ANY ham is
obligated to follow are the applicable government regulations associated
with the country they have been licensed by. Believe it or not, not all hams
After two Cat 5 Hurricanes, Irma and Maria, devastated the Vi I have been
able to get back to listening on topband with a few new reversible
DX-Engineering Beverage packages. The linemen from all over the country run
by an operation out of Plainville, NY have been rebuilding the entire
island's gri
Begin forwarded message:
> From: vu2gsm
> Date: January 16, 2018 at 04:28:11 GMT+5:30
> To: Mark van Wijk
> Subject: Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use
>
> Hello All,
> Guess lots and lots of water has flown below the bridge ( and below the
> belt!).
> First place the discussion was never on To
Sitting south of the house looking over the pond
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 11:00 AM, topband-requ...@contesting.com wrote:
>
> Send Topband mailing list submissions to
>topband@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://lists.con
Hi Nick and the group,
Nick, I was running a KW to my inv-V at 100'. Far as I know they don't use
SDR's. It was an interesting experiment and later around 08:00Z I did manage to
work G4AMN, EI6S and G4PEL direct. It amazed me how strong some of the stations
were in Europe and how hard they were
Well, I had to have a last last say did'nt I. In the latest February Edition of
Practical Wireless magazine is an article on a diversity adapter, whereby one
can connect your receiver to one ant port and say a websdtr or another receiver
at your 2nd home to the other port and than adjust the con
E31A was workable until about 0405Z, then faded quickly in Michigan.
Heard Tim's QSO and many other US 1's and 2's and some 3's, and some
others in MS, TX, IN, OH, IL, MI. Also some I's, an SP5, an RN3, OH7,
etc. (Only the E31A end, too much Aurora absorption to copy Europe from
Michigan)
GL all
E31A was up and down for a while last night, sometimes OK copy for me and
sometimes not.
But in the hour before his sunrise he really peaked up A LOT. My logger
tells me his sunrise at at 3:53Z and my QSO was about 40 minutes before
that.
Tim N3QE
_
Topband Reflector Archives - ht
Colorado: This morning I started calling CQ around 0550 local (12:50Z) time
and managed to work a few JA stations, HL5IVL was also around, all signals
were 4x5, rapid QSB was again prevalent.
I opened up the DXMaps website to see what others were hearing and saw that
JA1LZR had logged my signals
Did the Europeans hear your barefoot transmission, but you were not
able to hear their barefoot transmission Terry? Or were you both
using webSDRs in each others' localities?
(and was this on 160m?)
Thanks.
Nick
VE7DXR
At 06:44 2018-01-16, terry burge wrote:
Well I guess I had to find out
Hi gary,
I thought that was the rule. But I've not dug into it because I don't
use the remotes. So just now I looked and you are 100% right. Here's
what the ARRL web page says from Section 1...
*9. Station Location and Boundary:*
*a)*All stations used to make contacts for a specific DXCC
Jeff wrote:
“There is no way to supervise this behavior globally. .-
even though ARRL DXCC regulations make the use of an east-coast USA remote
receiver point perfectly acceptable. ...I really can't
complaint because it's allowed explicitly by the rules
Several members of this forum rightfully objected to my post "doubting"
VU2GSM's use of remote RX in QSOs since he had openly admitted to same
in his correspondence. Since I view my e-mail in reverse chronological
order, I had read Paul's post and responded before seeing the posts by
VE6WZ wit
Peter SM2CEW: Kudos on a great summery! I'm with you and many others
(like VE6WZ et al.)
73, Jan DL9KR.
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
There is no way to supervise this behavior globally. It's ultimately up
to each op to decide on what falls under ethical conduct. And opinions
vary as to what is proper and what's not, even among peoples of a single
country with similar cultural view.
I personally don't use receivers or ante
So..
- Station A in North America is calling CQ on 1827.0 and is heard by
Station B in Europe via a webSDR located 50 km away from Station A in
North America.
- Station B in Europe is calling Station A - who is listening via a
webSDR in Europe located 50 km away from Station B
- Both stati
21 matches
Mail list logo