Hi,
>
> Yawning Angel:
> the art [of] link padding
>
I remember this:
eecs.harvard.edu/~htk/publication/2005-jit-cheng-kung-tan.pdf
Wordlife,
Spencer
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Hi,
>
> grarpamp:
> Higher latency, in and of itself, does not
> provide any resistance to traffic
> analysis.
>
Increase one-way and it will become unusable; nothing to see here.
Wordlife,
Spencer
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torprojec
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:15:48 +
David Stainton wrote:
> The Differences Between Onion Routing and Mix Networks
> https://ritter.vg/blog-mix_and_onion_networks.html
Not implemented yet in tor (see prop 254), but this is the current state
of the art in link padding as a traffic analysis defense.
The Differences Between Onion Routing and Mix Networks
https://ritter.vg/blog-mix_and_onion_networks.html
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> I understand that the original Tor model is to set low-latency and
> low-jitter as a constraint as to permit things like interactiv
I understand that the original Tor model is to set low-latency and
low-jitter as a constraint as to permit things like interactive
web-browsing etc. And yes, I presume Tor will always have this as a
constraint.
I am asking if:
(1) There currently exists some way I can specify in my torrc to
sacri
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> I.e., if I want the extra resistance to traffic analysis that higher latency
> connections provide, is there a way to specify that in my Tor config?
Higher latency, in and of itself, does not provide any resistance to
traffic analysis.
ht
I.e., if I want the extra resistance to traffic analysis that higher
latency connections provide, is there a way to specify that in my Tor
config?
-V
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list