-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Removing metrics-team@ to avoid cross posting.]
On 28/01/16 21:22, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>
>> On 29 Jan 2016, at 07:20, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 06:33:51 +1100 Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
>>
I withdraw my desire this proposal. In Roster we wouldn't want these /16
network families---we just wanted to collapse some relays together when we
reliably believe they have the same operator, and there's no reason to
believe the majority of relays within a /16 are owned by the same person.
> On 5 Feb 2016, at 21:28, Virgil Griffith wrote:
>
> I withdraw my desire this proposal. In Roster we wouldn't want these /16
> network families---we just wanted to collapse some relays together when we
> reliably believe they have the same operator, and there's no reason to
>
> On 27 Jan 2016, at 18:19, grarpamp wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
>> No wrong answer---just wondering what is the community's vibe on this
>> issue. I can go either way.
>
> Same IP excepting NAT is same box, kind of
> On 29 Jan 2016, at 07:20, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 06:33:51 +1100
> Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>
>> Tor already considers relays in the same IPv4 /16 to be in the same family.
>
> Maybe a step further in this would be to
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 06:33:51 +1100
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
> Tor already considers relays in the same IPv4 /16 to be in the same family.
Maybe a step further in this would be to autoextend manually declared families
with all relays running on the same IPs of any
They are indeed configured in torrc. The question is whether two relays on
the same IP# *should* be in the same family even if they aren't.
-V
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016, Tristan wrote:
> Aren't family members configured in torrc?
> On Jan 26, 2016 11:01 PM,
For example, these two pairs of relays that came online yesterday:
* https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/0ED2D734F295427E5A3719FA7B9985C335839123
* https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/667C297D3EC6E1281D68F7F4C8C9BE8324D132A3
and
*
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> No wrong answer---just wondering what is the community's vibe on this
> issue. I can go either way.
Same IP excepting NAT is same box, kind of pointless if
they're not the same entity [1], err to caution and call it
Aren't family members configured in torrc?
On Jan 26, 2016 11:01 PM, "Virgil Griffith" wrote:
> For example, these two pairs of relays that came online yesterday:
> *
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/0ED2D734F295427E5A3719FA7B9985C335839123
>
> *
>
10 matches
Mail list logo