Hi,
There are two objectives here:
1) Reuse our itests in the webapp packaging scheme with little efforts to
convert. Automate the itests in web containers and report the results at the
client side.
2) Automate the start/deploy/undeploy/stop of the web applications against
various web conta
Hi,
What problem did you with maven 2.0.5? I'm running maven 2.0.8 now.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
Raymond Feng wrote
It is that time again, let's start collaborating in Tuscany draft
report in our wiki [1]
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+Board+Report
-- Forwarded message --
From: Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 3, 2008 4:47 PM
Subject: REMINDER:
My personal opinion
> - 2.0.7 and later?
On Feb 3, 2008 2:29 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have checked in my changes.
>
> Your changes break the build for me as they require Maven 2.0.6. Our 1.1
> release worked with Maven 2.0.5.
>
By going with this approach, we can reutilize a lot of existing tests
(our iTests for example), instead of having to create/migrate new
tests using htmlUnit. As for cargo, it does not support all the
hosting platforms we are supporting, right ?
On Feb 3, 2008 2:42 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I have checked in my changes.
Your changes break the build for me as they require Maven 2.0.6. Our 1.1
release worked with Maven 2.0.5.
I'm installing the latest Maven (2.0.8) now but what do people prefer?
- continue to work with 2.0.5 and later
- 2.0.6 and later?
-
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 5:04 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I have a question about the implementation of the "wsdlless"
deployment
function.
The issues I see are occurring in a couple of places within the
life-cycle.
Namely, deployment, bind
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 5:04 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I have a question about the implementation of the "wsdlless"
deployment
function.
The issues I see are occurring in a couple of places within the
life-cycle.
Namely, deployment, binding start, and servic
> > what about using Docbook for documenting things?
>
> I can't comment on that as I don't know docbook. Any thoughts from others?
I was thinking about a developer manual:
* your general structure, the invocation infrastructure, the fact
that components
are active objects...and so on.
>
> > Anot
Mike Edwards wrote:
Jean-Sebastien,
Let's chat some more about objectives, to see why we're seeming to look
at this differently:
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I was thinking about the following binary distro zips:
- tuscany-core.zip - The base that everybody needs.
core assembly
Jean-Sebastien,
Let's chat some more about objectives, to see why we're seeming to look
at this differently:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Mike Edwards wrote:
[snip]
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide:
- smaller packages
- easier for peopl
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
2008/2/3, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There's a lot i think the project could do to encourage others to
participate, here's a few things I can think of -
We have a lot of downloads and real users, we need to try to get more of
these people engaged and contri
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
I'm leaning more towards what Mike is suggesting.
OK it doesn't look like we're reaching a consensus as at least two
people don't seem to like the scheme I proposed.
I take it back then, forget about my proposal, but I still think that a
single download containing al
On Feb 3, 2008 5:10 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2008 4:55 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 2008 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > When we get the go ahead it's left from me to upload the artifacts to
> > > www.apac
Thanks for the speedy feedback.
On Feb 3, 2008 4:55 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2008 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We know how we want our distribution directories structured (see start
> of
> > thread).
>
> great
>
> > There is a dr
On Feb 3, 2008 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We know how we want our distribution directories structured (see start of
> thread).
great
> There is a draft release page here (
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+1.1-incubating).
> I'd appreciate it if
On Feb 3, 2008 12:31 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 4:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
> > 1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany
>
On Feb 3, 2008 3:10 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 03/02/2008, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 2008 4:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
> > > 1.1-incubating
On 03/02/2008, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 4:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
> > 1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany dev
> > list [
2008/2/3, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> There's a lot i think the project could do to encourage others to
> >>> participate, here's a few things I can think of -
> >>>
> >>> We have a lot of downloads and real users, we need to try to get more of
> >>> these people engaged and c
On Feb 1, 2008 4:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
> 1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany dev
> list [1] I am posting here before proceeding to copy the artifacts up to
> www.apa
On Feb 2, 2008 3:23 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Edwards wrote:
> [snip]
> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >> I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide:
> >> - smaller packages
> >> - easier for people to find what they need
> >>
> >
> > I agree with
On Feb 1, 2008 5:41 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Sorry for the long text, I make it availabe on our WIKI too:
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Automation+of+itests+in+web+applications
> ).
>
> In our WAR packaging scheme, we package SCA artifacts
23 matches
Mail list logo
