On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:12:54 +0200
geon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* My TB doesnt support it. And maybe even others mail clients.Its really
wasting of time to change the adress all the time. I like to help, but
if the was more of such a inconvieniencies I would give it up. My time
is
OT, but wasn't Sylpheed some futuristic fighter/bomber they made a bad movie about in the eighties?On 7/19/05, John Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:12:54 +0200geon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * My TB doesnt support it. And maybe even others mail clients.Its really wasting
However, there are significant downsides to enabling Reply-to munging:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
I agree with most of those reasons, and so I won't enable Reply-to munging
unless there's a real overriding reason that trumps the ones listed on
that page.
I found
Hi John,
John Montgomery wrote:
I am surprised that Thunderbird does not have a Reply All button.
It does - and I just hit it!
;-)
--
Regards,
PhilK
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public key: http://www.xfr.co.uk
Voicemail Facsimile: 07092 070518
You'll find that one part's sweet and
Mailman can be set up to reply to the forum, but
people on this list prefer to live with pain!
--- geon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Seems to me as very unuseful thing in this phorum,
when I choose Replay
to any message, the field to whom or Receiver is
all the time not
tutor@python.org
Hi,
Seems to me as very unuseful thing in this phorum, when I choose Replay
to any message, the field to whom or Receiver is all the time not
tutor@python.org but the original sender! Why? I can not understand that?
It sould be prefferably posted back to mailing list IMHO.
--
geon
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, geon wrote:
Seems to me as very unuseful thing in this forum, when I choose Replay
to any message, the field to whom or Receiver is all the time not
tutor@python.org but the original sender! Why? I can not understand
that?
[meta: mailing list admin stuff]
Hi Geon,
Danny Yoo napsal(a):
However, there are significant downsides to enabling Reply-to munging:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
I agree with most of those reasons, and so I won't enable Reply-to munging
unless there's a real overriding reason that trumps the ones listed on
that
