Danny Yoo napsal(a): >However, there are significant downsides to enabling Reply-to munging: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > >I agree with most of those reasons, and so I won't enable Reply-to munging >unless there's a real overriding reason that trumps the ones listed on >that page. > > Firtsly, sorry for my English.
Then I must must admit I didnt understand all what is written in http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html and even I didnt read it attentively. Anyway the main reason IMHO why he decided to do so is having Elm (or even creating it?) which *easily* (I could say freedomly for "lector"=helper) supports both sending to mailing list and to original sender. I got tho some reason against: * I like to help. But I like to help all, All should have benefit from my replay. I know this from my own experience. Often, very often I browse the old messages and read what other wrote. Its also good when there are always the same questions.... My effort shouldnt die immendiately after sending my replay. The freedom of all is more that freedom of one. * My TB doesnt support it. And maybe even others mail clients.Its really wasting of time to change the adress all the time. I like to help, but if the was more of such a inconvieniencies I would give it up. My time is expensive :-) * There is no reason for questioner not to like to see my replay in mailing list, I think. Why would he do it? Why should he want me just for him? To be able to read your replay pls use easy english ;-) -- geon Vyjímka je pravidlo. Rekurzivní. _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
