Dear Sir,
i am using MPC8280 in our board which has 512MB of SDRAM i.e. from micron.
when i give command mtest only for 1MB to check memory test from U-boot,
machine check and program exception is coming after 40 - 60mins later it hangs
giving program check exception
i have checked the SDRAM c
Hi
I would like to do some more extensive tests with the U-boot and took a look
at http://www.denx.de/wiki/DUTS/DUTSDocs
I think that the wiki is somehow out of date as examples as the following
a) ./duts b should be rewritten to /duts -showconfig ?
Is this true?
b) ./duts -showconfig v38b giv
This patch is based on a patch for canyonlands by Stefan Roese.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach
---
board/gdsys/compactcenter/compactcenter.c | 16
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/gdsys/compactcenter/compactcenter.c
b/board/gdsys/compactcenter
This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even bigger
Linux kernels (> 8MB) can be booted.
This patch also sets CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_LEN to 16MB (default 8MB) to enable
decompression of bigger images.
Signed-of
hello, everyone.
Has somebody ported U-boot to s3c6410? I want add mmc/sd reading and
writing in 6410 u-boot. Can somebody give me some hints?
Thanks in advance.
--
Michael L.
Jul 30, 2009
___
U-Bo
Hi Prafulla,
I'm using a little-endian machine.
My board is freescale i.mx51, the core is arm12.
I will try to correct these two places and test it in my board.
Hope it can work.
Thanks~~
Yours
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Prafulla Wadaskar [
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:53:44 +0200
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> When updating the "reg" in the "/localbus/fl...@f000,0" node
> size was wrong updated for the first flash, because the total
> size was filled in, instead of the right size for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
applied.
Thanks
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <4a7003a4.2050...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> Heiko Schocher wrote:
> > Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> In message <4a6ed511.6010...@denx.de> you wrote:
> >>> Hello Wolfgang,
> >>>
> >>> The following changes since commit
> >>> 94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acba
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message <73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e202de13c...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com>
you wrote:
>
> Hopefully you might have received my new patch series (posted 30 hours back)
> I know it's very busy time for you.
I received it, but did not have time for a thorough review yet.
Dear Rupesh Kumar,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> I am using u-boot version 1.3.0 included in freescale LTIB released for
> MPC8313ERDB custom board.
> I tried NAND booting of MPC8313ERDB board using this u-boot and it worked
> fine.
U-Boot 1.3.0 is very old. Please try top of tree (v2009.08-rc
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:05:45PM +0530, Rupesh Kumar wrote:
> I am using u-boot version 1.3.0 included in freescale LTIB released for
> MPC8313ERDB custom board.
> I tried NAND booting of MPC8313ERDB board using this u-boot and it worked
> fine.
>
> Using similar procedure i tried NAND boot o
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:49 PM
> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> Cc: U-Boot; Ben Warren
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request
>
> Dear Jean-C
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Trimarchi [mailto:trimar...@gandalf.sssup.it]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 8:41 PM
> To: Remy Bohmer
> Cc: Lv Terry-R65388; Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Is it an error in function
> ehci_submit_root() in ehci-h
Hi all,
I am using u-boot version 1.3.0 included in freescale LTIB released for
MPC8313ERDB custom board.
I tried NAND booting of MPC8313ERDB board using this u-boot and it worked
fine.
Using similar procedure i tried NAND boot on my custom board but it dint
work :(
My board has large page N
Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
> This patch updates zlib to the latest stable version.
Hi,
this patch finally works for me, thank you.
Reviewed-by: rhabarber1848
Cheers, rhabarber1848
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/m
Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/7/29 Lv Terry-R65388 :
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>I'm trying to enable ehci usb in our board and I found that there
>> maybe two issues in funcion ehci_submit_root() in ehci-hcd.c.
>>
>> 1)
>>In ehci_submit_root(), the function will do the following operation.
>>
Hi,
2009/7/29 Lv Terry-R65388 :
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to enable ehci usb in our board and I found that there
> maybe two issues in funcion ehci_submit_root() in ehci-hcd.c.
>
> 1)
> In ehci_submit_root(), the function will do the following operation.
>
> From line 553 in ehci-hcd.c:
>
>
Hi Peter,
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 16:36:17 Peter Tyser wrote:
> > This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
> > initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even
> > bigger Linux kernels (> 8MB) can be booted.
>
> Might be nice to increase CONFIG_SYS
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:27 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear John,
>
> in message <1248813631.3915.102.ca...@johns> you wrote:
> >
> > It seems to me that DUTS is designed to test U-Boot and also automates
> > the running of commands whose output can be put online in the DULG. I
>
> Correct. An
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:25 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
> initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even bigger
> Linux kernels (> 8MB) can be booted.
Might be nice to increase CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message you
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > My "patch tracking" is based on the Subject: =A0lines, =A0and =A0it =A0ca=
> uses
> > additional =A0work =A0(and =A0eventually introduces errors) when you rena=
> me
>
> Do you use Patchworks? I
This patch is based on a diff created by Phong Vo from AMCC.
Signed-off-by: Phong Vo
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
---
board/amcc/canyonlands/canyonlands.c | 26 +-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/amcc/canyonlands/canyonlands.c
b/bo
This patch is based on a diff created by Phong Vo from AMCC.
Signed-off-by: Phong Vo
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
---
cpu/ppc4xx/cpu.c| 23 +++
include/asm-ppc/processor.h |2 ++
include/ppc440.h|5 +
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0
Some Canyonlands boards are equipped with different SODIMM's. This is no
problem with the "normal" NOR booting Canyonlands U-Boot, since it
automatically detects the SODIMM's via SPD data and correctly configures
them. But the NAND booting version is different. Here we only have 4k
of image size to
This patch moves the load addresses for kernel, fdt and ramdisk to higher
addresses (>= 16MB). This enables booting of bigger kernel images (e.g.
lockdep enabled).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
---
include/configs/amcc-common.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even bigger
Linux kernels (> 8MB) can be booted.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
---
include/configs/amcc-common.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 d
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> My "patch tracking" is based on the Subject: lines, and it causes
> additional work (and eventually introduces errors) when you rename
Do you use Patchworks? I don't know if it handles renamed patches,
but a public patchworks web page
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 07:47 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott,
>
> In message <20090728225244.ga8...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
> >
> > The patch title is bad -- it's not disabling warnings, it's disabling an
> > aspect of C99 that the code is incompatible with (and which is pr
Hi rhbarber1848,
I've merged patches into one only and resent it to list (v5).
Please verify once more the issue is solved, to close it definitively.
Cheers and thanks,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On
Behalf Of rhaba
Hi,
Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
>> Hi rhabarber1848,
>> please could you test latest two zlib patches I have sent few minutes
>> ago?
>
> Unfortunately you add outcb() only in inflatestart and inflateend. IT
> should also go in the main loop.
you are right. The two patc
> Hi rhabarber1848,
> please could you test latest two zlib patches I have sent few minutes ago?
Unfortunately you add outcb() only in inflatestart and inflateend. IT should
also go in the main loop.
Being an out-callback with arguments, it should be called during copy to
output, with proper argu
Hi rhabarber1848,
please could you test latest two zlib patches I have sent few minutes ago?
NOTE: the first one is waiting for approval due to its big size.
Thanks, I hope these patches will solve your issue.
G.
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-bou
This patch adds watchdog reset call to allow its invokation during decompression
phase. This control was present on old zlib version and here it is
backported for those relevant routines. This patch is sent as a zlib separate
one beacuse it was not tested due to specific board lack.
zlib patches wi
Hello Wolfgang,
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In message <4a6ed511.6010...@denx.de> you wrote:
>>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acbac1ecfaeb8f69:
>>> Wolfgang Denk (1):
>>> Prepare 2009.08-rc1 (again, after fixing la
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <1248835792-1882-1-git-send-email-kumar.g...@freescale.com> you
wrote:
> "All Rights Reserved" conflicts with the GPL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
> ---
> Wolfgang,
>
> I would ask that you apply this now rather than later as it just addresses the
> "All Rights Re
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <4a6ed511.6010...@denx.de> you wrote:
>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>
>> The following changes since commit 94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acbac1ecfaeb8f69:
>> Wolfgang Denk (1):
>> Prepare 2009.08-rc1 (again, after fixing last minute issues).
>>
>> are a
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <4a6ed511.6010...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit 94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acbac1ecfaeb8f69:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Prepare 2009.08-rc1 (again, after fixing last minute issues).
>
> are available in the git rep
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <4a6ea976.9070...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit 94978e19f31d225b4f7d97c4acbac1ecfaeb8f69:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Prepare 2009.08-rc1 (again, after fixing last minute issues).
>
> are available in the git rep
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <200907280729.23996...@denx.de> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 10c7604d021949464b1e4ba903df95e6b2f0d2ff:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Prepare 2009.08-rc1
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git m
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message <20090727185329.874ef2ae.kim.phill...@freescale.com> you wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang, please pull (mostly) support for the VME8349 board (it's
> initial patch was posted well in advance of the window) and a couple of
> fixes:
>
> The following changes since commit 94978e19f
Dear rhabarber1848,
In message you wrote:
>
> > Actually I'm waiting for a new patch that integrates that fix.
>
> please do not commit the zlib-1.2.3 patch in its current state, although
> Alessandro's patch fixes on bug there is still the problem that the
> WATCHDOG_RESET() calls from gunzip.
Dear Giuseppe CONDORELLI,
In message <001701ca1015$dbf7fae0$c0818...@st.com> you wrote:
>
> > Actually I'm waiting for a new patch that integrates that fix.
> Maybe I've not understood.
> Do you mean you are waiting a new zlib patch [v4] that includes Alessandro's
> patch, to apply
> only one pat
Hi All,
I'm trying to enable ehci usb in our board and I found that there
maybe two issues in funcion ehci_submit_root() in ehci-hcd.c.
1)
In ehci_submit_root(), the function will do the following operation.
>From line 553 in ehci-hcd.c:
typeReq = req->request << 8 | req->req
43 matches
Mail list logo
