DT for the following kernel.
>
> Link: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-September/462006.html
> Fixed: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213753
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Katsnelson
> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan
> ---
> The code of this patch comes from
.html
> Fixed: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213753
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Katsnelson
> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan
> ---
> The code of this patch comes from "[RFC PATCH] rpi: copy the EMMC
> controller configuration from firmware-supplied DT" [
html
Fixed: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213753
Signed-off-by: Ilya Katsnelson
Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan
---
The code of this patch comes from "[RFC PATCH] rpi: copy the EMMC
controller configuration from firmware-supplied DT" [1] basically.
I only add the message and some
On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 14:51, Ilya K wrote:
> Now that you mention EBBR: I've actually looked at what TianoCore does
> here, and they report different ACPI tables based on the SoC revision as
> well. It's probably a better option in the long run, but we already have
> people running NixOS on Pi4
On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 14:29, Ilya K wrote:
> There is no DTB embedded in U-Boot here - the DTB comes from the
> distribution that U-Boot is booting (in my case NixOS, but it's likely
> other similar setups are affected as well).
>
That's exactly what we (Arm/Linaro) try to avoid from now on wit
Hi
It looks real strange to ignore the authoritative entity and try to patch a
wrong DTB embedded in U-Boot.
Arm SystemReady is definitively aligning to the authoritative entities in
the platform to give U-Boot the right basis on which it can apply
additional overlays (providing it has a way to v
We need this to boot with a custom DTB on BCM2711C0-based Pi 4s
Signed-off-by: Ilya Katsnelson
---
board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 63 +
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
index 372b26b6f2..f0
7 matches
Mail list logo