On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:50:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 4 June 2015 at 17:48, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference
> >> between U-Boot proper and SPL i
Hi Tom,
On 4 June 2015 at 17:48, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass wrote:
>> With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference
>> between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree.
>> This series adds this support, usi
Hi Tom,
On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass wrote:
> With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference
> between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree.
> This series adds this support, using a Rockchip board as an example.
I'd like to apply some of
With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference
between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree.
This series adds this support, using a Rockchip board as an example.
One problem with device tree is that U-Boot has no way of dropping features
it does no
4 matches
Mail list logo
