A pre-backport for Intrepid would be great! With the huge demand for OOo
3 in Intrepid, it makes sense for it to have priority over the Hardy
backport. I'm sure Hardy LTS users won't mind waiting a little bit to
make sure the Hardy backport is stable.
--
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
Yeah, looks that way. For Intrepid due to its high demand we may be able
to work with calc to get it in as a "pre-backport" on the verbal
contract that a newer version will be uploaded to Jaunty (which is
almost certainly the case)
Once we get it backported to Intrepid we can figure out how and if
It has been mentioned in bug 267376 that it is not possible to have
versioned package support. This backport will have to wait until OOo 3
is included in Jaunty.
--
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283137
You received this bug notification because you are
I personally do not feel comfortable backporting commonly-used server
packages that have a long track history of needing security update
maintenance because inevitably people lose interest and we cannot
guarantee the same 18 months or 5 years of security updates that the
Security Team can. Are ther
If the Openoffice.org team can put side-by-side installable
openoffice.org3 packages in Intrepid or Jaunty then sure, I'd be glad to
work with them on a backport to Hardy. Otherwise this is difficult for
me to do alone.
--
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 283137 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283137
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 283137
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
--
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3.0 to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284692
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Hardy's MySQL is 10 point releases from the latest MySQL
Can you please backport the MySQL from intrepid Ibex to hardy.
** Affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please Backport MySQL 5.0.67 from intrepid to hardy
https://bugs.launchpad
Public bug reported:
Next 3 year why should use OO2.4.1 version?
Hardy LTS right? I thing OpenOffice.org is importand for desktop
Many thanks
** Affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3.0 to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
The backport has been uploaded to the Backports PPA:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-backporters/+archive
It has not built yet but locally I've tested this on a Gutsy system with no
detectable regressions
** Changed in: gutsy-backports
Status: New => Confirmed
--
firefox 3.0.3 backp
Please follow new bug at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gutsy-
backports/+bug/284508 for Firefox 3.0.3 final.
** Changed in: gutsy-backports
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
Backport Firefox 3.0 beta 5 from Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212468
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
I am updating the gutsy firefox backport to 3.0.3 from Hardy Security.
Backports PPA packages will be available shortly but I will need testers
to test the upgrade path and also look for regressions (particularly
when it comes to plugins)
** Affects: gutsy-backports
Impo
Sorry, I'm reopening this because it still might be worth backporting
the current Intrepid version (0.3.0-0ubuntu7). There seems to be quite a
lot of important bug fixes listed in the changelog, including some
patches from upstream.
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: Invalid => New
--
Thanks, but this version isn't available in Intrepid, so there is
nothing to backport. As it is unlikely to make it in to Intrepid (the
archives are frozen for release now), I'm closing this request as
Invalid.
If this version appears in Intrepid as a SRU after release, then please
feel free to re
Public bug reported:
Please backport the version of Quassel above to hardy, from intrepid.
This version fixes many bugs and offers a lot of new features.
** Affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please backport Quassel 0.3.0.2 from intrepid to hardy
https:/
Hew - I just noticed that you closed the hardy-backports task on this
one and opened a pidgin task instead. In this case, it was valid against
hardy-backports because the bug is reported against the backported
version of Pidgin. Bugs against backported packages should be opened
against the relevant
someone might have a look for the genshi backport? so we get step by
step to trac .. no?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/270705
thx®ards.
--
Please backport trac 0.11-2 to hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260961
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click on t
17 matches
Mail list logo
