On Feb 29, 2012, at 05:22 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>* There are several different loose categories of devices we're talking
> about:
>
> + Integrated Apple pads in laptops
>
> + Apple magic touch mice, plugged in via USB(?)
>
> + Integrated pads in netbooks (like Dell Mini V)
>
> + Others?
On Mar 01, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>As a former tap-to-click hater who has come back around, I think this
>was largely a result of the drivers being deficient at identifying
>intentional vs. unintentional touches to the touchpad.
>
>With each release, this behavior has gotten better.
On Feb 29, 2012, at 02:18 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>Do you have a preference between having multitouch click and drag vs 2 finger
>click for right click?
Given only those two choices, I'd probably opt for 2 finger click == right
click, but hey, I'm mostly a keyboard driver. :)
-Barry
--
ubunt
On Feb 29, 2012, at 01:11 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>I recently added "ClickPad" support in Precise. This is automatically picked
>up by most Synaptics and all Apple Macbook trackpads. It will soon be picked
>up by more Synaptics trackpads and the Apple Magic Trackpad. ClickPad support
>entails the
On 03/02/2012 10:14 AM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:55:58PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
I'm beginning to think that this is all so complicated even when we
try to be verbose and convey things as accurately as possible that
nothing short of "it just works perfectly and exac
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:55:58PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> I'm beginning to think that this is all so complicated even when we
> try to be verbose and convey things as accurately as possible that
> nothing short of "it just works perfectly and exactly how I wanted"
> will be good enough. Alth
On Friday, March 02, 2012 05:15:36 PM Martin Pitt wrote:
> Scott Kitterman [2012-03-01 11:25 -0500]:
> > It was my understanding that the primary purpose of U/I and string
> > freeze was to allow documentation developers and translators time to
> > get their work done.
> Mine as well.
>
> I was ac
Scott Kitterman [2012-03-01 11:25 -0500]:
> It was my understanding that the primary purpose of U/I and string freeze was
> to allow documentation developers and translators time to get their work done.
Mine as well.
I was actually quite surprised when Rodney pointed out the "... in the
default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Seems you are trying to be truly agile with a system that isn't :p I
have lost my fan-ness of the tools used during the development process
in the Ubuntu world myself. It is as fragmented as Linux is these
days. I have never been a fan of the bluepri
On 03/02/12 08:58, Tim Gardner wrote:
In light of the concerns about overlayfs being sufficiently cooked in
time for Precise, Andy Whitcroft and I have decided to re-enable aufs.
Thank you, that's helpful and comforting.
We will continue to advocate for dropping aufs in favor of a sufficient
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Tim Edwards [2012-02-17 11:49 +0100]:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012, at 07:23 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > linux-headers-* is already covered by apt-get autoremove, which is
> > > good. Perhaps we can mark older kernels as auto-removable as
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:19:48AM +, Dieter Miosga wrote:
> Please change in file linux_32.0-17.27.diff
> at line 5268, and all following and preceding occurences , to
>
> --- linux-3.2.0.orig/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ linux-3.2.0/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -663,6 +663,16 @@
> unsi
On 03/01/2012 03:08 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
Hi.
aufs was reliable for us on Oneiric when creating ephemeral lxc
instances based on an underlying template. The most recent overlayfs
issue that we discovered is today's
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/944386
The summary is that
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 12:56:13AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 05:08:36PM -0500, Gary Poster wrote:
> > aufs was reliable for us on Oneiric when creating ephemeral lxc
> > instances based on an underlying template. The most recent
> > overlayfs issue that we dis
Hi Gary,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 05:08:36PM -0500, Gary Poster wrote:
> aufs was reliable for us on Oneiric when creating ephemeral lxc
> instances based on an underlying template. The most recent
> overlayfs issue that we discovered is today's
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+b
Hi Dieter,
I'm not sure I understand your request. The file you seem you mean is from
the Linux kernel package ("linux_3.2.0-17.27.diff.gz"), which collects all
the various patches Ubuntu carries for the kernel.
The routine you've quoted is from the NX-emulation patchset from:
http://git.kernel.o
16 matches
Mail list logo
