On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:45:46AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if it would be a good idea to change the page allocator
zeroing
policy from zero on allocate (for GFP_USER) to zero on free for the -virtual
kernel builds.
This has been initally proposed in
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has a
duty to correct. Frankly, I think there's no reason that Adam and Björn
couldn't have been ready for upload rights by January, *if* the DMB's
I
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 04:22:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
[…]
So my question to each of the candidates is this. As a member of the DMB,
what would you do to remove this uncertainty around when people are ready to
apply, reducing the number of rejections (whether those
Hello Jani,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:23:39AM +, Jani Monoses wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has a
duty to correct. Frankly, I think there's no reason that Adam and
Hello,
On 31.01.2013 11:08, Iain Lane wrote:
As others have said, it's probably not going to be possible to reduce
the process to going through a checklist. What we can do is to be
responsive /and proactive/ when applications first come in (or even
before then, if applicants contact the DMB
Peter,
am Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:45:46AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
I would like to know if it would be a good idea to change the page allocator
zeroing policy from zero on allocate (for GFP_USER) to zero on free for the
-virtual kernel builds.
wouldn't it be better to signal the
Hello,
On 31.01.2013 14:51, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I don't think having an intermediary between the DMB and the applicant is a
good idea. I think approximately that last thing we need is more meetings.
I didn't say that this needs to happen in a meeting format.
In your earlier mail you
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 09:23:39 AM Jani Monoses wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has a
duty to correct. Frankly, I think there's no reason that Adam and Björn
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 03:03:52 PM Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello,
On 31.01.2013 14:51, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I don't think having an intermediary between the DMB and the applicant is
a
good idea. I think approximately that last thing we need is more
meetings.
I didn't say
Hello,
On 31.01.2013 15:08, Scott Kitterman wrote:
While the advisory team can,
and should, encourage and support applicants, I think we should be careful to
avoid making them an intermediary.
I wasn't trying to say that this should be a mandatory step.
If you go back to my original mail I
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 03:30:42 PM Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello,
On 31.01.2013 15:08, Scott Kitterman wrote:
While the advisory team can,
and should, encourage and support applicants, I think we should be careful
to avoid making them an intermediary.
I wasn't trying to say that
On 01/30/2013 07:22 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:36:19AM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
The Developer Membership Board has started a vote to restaff for the
four members whose terms are expiring. The Developer Membership Board is
responsible for reviewing and
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:06:31 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 09:23:39 AM Jani Monoses wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
That's certainly true, but I think this is something that the DMB has
a duty to correct.
Just my 2 cents. Firefox on kubuntu without kde support is terrible. A new
user to kubuntu will consider kubuntu a fail when using firefox without kde
support.
In my opinion rekonq vs. Firefox without kde integration rekonq wins hands
down.
On Jan 31, 2013 1:57 PM, Clay Weber c...@claydoh.com
Dnia czwartek, 31 stycznia 2013 14:22:12 Dale Trombley pisze:
Just my 2 cents. Firefox on kubuntu without kde support is terrible. A new user
to kubuntu will
consider kubuntu a fail when using firefox without kde support. In my opinion
rekonq vs.
Firefox without kde integration rekonq wins
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 05:08:22 PM Jani Monoses wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:06:31 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 09:23:39 AM Jani Monoses wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
That's certainly true,
Hi Scott, Bhavani,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 03:02:44AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Regardless of if it's the DMB or other delegated body, the decision about
upload rights is on behalf of the Ubuntu project and it needs to be taken
with the project's needs in mind. I don't think there is any
Removed from queue since needs fixing:
*
https://code.launchpad.net/~qrilka/ubuntu/precise/libvirt/libvirt-fix-1092826/+merge/141163
*
https://code.launchpad.net/~roger.light/ubuntu/quantal/mosquitto/fix-972389/+merge/141467
*
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 04:12:25 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Scott, Bhavani,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 03:02:44AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Regardless of if it's the DMB or other delegated body, the decision about
upload rights is on behalf of the Ubuntu project and it needs to be
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Steve Langasek
steve.langa...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi Scott, Bhavani,
snip
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:36:38AM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
What I believe is a perspective developer gets ready for applying at a
particular level when a minimum of one developer
On Friday, February 01, 2013 11:27:07 AM Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
...
I like Daniel's idea of having an informal exchange (maybe over a ping
or a pm on irc) of how the DMB thinks so that we can really get an
info of how the DMB thinks on various cases so that we can provide a
broad overview of
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Friday, February 01, 2013 11:27:07 AM Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
...
I like Daniel's idea of having an informal exchange (maybe over a ping
or a pm on irc) of how the DMB thinks so that we can really get an
info of
22 matches
Mail list logo
