Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

2013-12-13 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > As of latest cmake upload into trusty, it is now trivial to > cross-compile CMake based projects: > > One time setup: > $ mk-sbuild --target armhf trusty > > Building a package: > $ sbuild -A -d trusty --host armhf package*.dsc > > This

Re: EGL Drivers and Mir/Wayland

2013-10-07 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Williams, Kyle wrote: > Hello, > > I am still not 100% positive what exactly EGL is, but I saw people talking > about it on a forum thread, and some were saying that if AMD/Nvidia were to > release EGL-compatible drivers, these drivers would work with both the Mir

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-17 Thread Thomas Voß
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Robert Ancell wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kitterman > wrote: >> >> On Monday, June 17, 2013 09:52:49 PM Oliver Ries wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Scott Kitterman >> wrote: >> Part of the problem is that no one outside Canonica

Re: MeeGo applauncherd: faster application startup and more

2013-06-17 Thread Thomas Voß
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On 13-06-17 01:33 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote: >> Hi all! >> I'm sending this message both to ubuntu-devel and ubuntu-phone, in the >> hope of reaching the widest interested audience as possible. However, >> please reply to ubuntu-devel o

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-17 Thread Thomas Voß
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 01:10:29PM -0700, Jono Bacon wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: >> >> > Primary focus for GNOME will be Wayland. There are a few things that >> > Wayland does not support that X did support.

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] MeeGo applauncherd: faster application startup and more

2013-06-17 Thread Thomas Voß
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote: > On Monday 17 June 2013 07:43:26 Thomas Voß wrote: >> thanks for bringing this up. Upstart user session will take care of >> single application instances and integrates with AppArmor to implement >> our confinement s

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] MeeGo applauncherd: faster application startup and more

2013-06-16 Thread Thomas Voß
Hey Alberto, thanks for bringing this up. Upstart user session will take care of single application instances and integrates with AppArmor to implement our confinement strategy (for >= saucy). The interesting feature from my pov is the accelerated application startup. Is that relying on preloading

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-14 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, June 14, 2013 07:33:05 PM Oliver Grawert wrote: >> hi, >> >> On Fr, 2013-06-14 at 13:12 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > On Friday, June 14, 2013 11:09:25 AM Oliver Ries wrote: >> > > in addition to that I just want to highligh

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-14 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, June 14, 2013 06:41:33 PM Thomas Voß wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:47:43PM +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote: >> >> KDE, this one is inte

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-14 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:47:43PM +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote: >> KDE, this one is interesting. The one even tries to support >> proprietary OS. The same also claim their CI has very limited distro >> coverage so they cannot support distro sp

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-14 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, June 14, 2013 11:15:17 AM Marc Deslauriers wrote: >> On 13-06-14 11:04 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > On Friday, June 14, 2013 03:54:32 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> >> Here's a discussion I half started as part of vUDS. >> >> >

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-14 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Thomas Voß wrote: >> User sessions then talk to this system-level Mir instance, >> including Mir itself. But to state this clearly, XMir will support the >> X session s

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-14 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:25:29PM +0200, Thomas Voß wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Thomas Voß wrote: >> >> User sessions

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-14 Thread Thomas Voß
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On 13-06-14 11:04 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Friday, June 14, 2013 03:54:32 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: >>> Here's a discussion I half started as part of vUDS. >>> >>> The switch to Mir in Ubuntu seems pretty risky for the existance o

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-14 Thread Thomas Voß
Hi all, On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:54:32PM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> >> Here's a discussion I half started as part of vUDS. >> >> The switch to Mir in Ubuntu seems pretty risky for the existance of >> Kubuntu, I wonder if other fla

Re: We need your help for GSoC 2013

2013-03-25 Thread Thomas Voß
On 24.03.2013 17:21, Dylan McCall wrote: > We're going to be applying for Google Summer of Code (GSoC) this year. > I'm sure many of you know the drill at this stage: it's an opportunity > to grow Ubuntu's developer community, share knowledge with talented > university students, make friends and ge

Capturing system and app performance metrics during autopilot test runs

2013-03-20 Thread Thomas Voß
Hey all, our current daily quality efforts are focused on functional testing of the overall (Unity) stack. That is, we are executing a large number of autopilot tests in an automated manner to verify that any change within the overall ecosystem does not break the user facing functionality. >From

Input methods: Frameworks and overall integration

2013-03-20 Thread Thomas Voß
Hey all, during the recent vUDS and the time after, questions/discussions about input methods in general, supported frameworks in Ubuntu, and overall integration issues with Mir have been popping up. I created a blueprint at: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-input-meth