2009/2/27 (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo
> Olá Surfaz e a todos.
That isn't Spanish.. xD
> On Thursday 26 February 2009 16:35:40 Surfaz Gemon Meme wrote:
> > sudo cp libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/
>
> Is it there or on:
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/
>
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
is a
On 01/03/09 10:29, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> no no... after i got HUGE fonts, i reset the DPI to 96 (looked
> better) and then on certain apps, i just increase the font size
> (like kmail or firefox).
> Guess i'll have to reset my font size and just try to increase the
> DPI to a nice value.
Olá Chris e a todos.
On Friday 27 February 2009 17:27:22 Chris Cheney wrote:
> > Hi have a 13" at 1280x800 (DPI 112 according to xorg log) and I have to
> > increase mine, but I dont see as good as I used to.
>
> It seems strange that you needed to increase the font size when your DPI
> setting
Am 28.02.2009 um 22:08 schrieb Chris Cheney:
> Also where is a 100x100 image not displayed as such?
On a printer, for example. If application designers would map
pictures to a printer the same way they currently map it to the
screen, users would likely call them insane. Now try to imagine a
Am 28.02.2009 um 19:52 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
> On Saturday 28 February 2009 6:38:04 am Markus Hitter wrote:
>> I can understand this is difficult to get swallowed. For 40 (or more)
>> years now, the rule was 1 pixel = 1 dot on the screen. A picture,
>> 100px x 100px in size used to use exactl
