Re: ubuntu-releases package

Just my humble opinion. Benjamin Drung wrote: > Install karmic and start packaging. Then you will discover this: dch > will use karmic as default, but new packages target either lucid or > karmic-proposed. lintian does not know lucid. They may be other package, > wich are not aware of lucid. Here

Re: Ubuntu Domain Server

Ryan Dwyer wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Christopher Chan > > wrote: > > > > > > Deciding that those defaults actually would be is another kettle of > > fish entirely and I surmise that a democratic process of some sort, >

Re: Ubuntu Domain Server

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Christopher Chan < christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: > > > > > Deciding that those defaults actually would be is another kettle of > > fish entirely and I surmise that a democratic process of some sort, > > perhaps brainstorm, would be a good way to settle

Re: Ubuntu Domain Server

> > Deciding that those defaults actually would be is another kettle of > fish entirely and I surmise that a democratic process of some sort, > perhaps brainstorm, would be a good way to settle this inherently > political section. > That can of worms has to be opened and emptied. The one singl

ubuntu-releases package

Hi, Install karmic and start packaging. Then you will discover this: dch will use karmic as default, but new packages target either lucid or karmic-proposed. lintian does not know lucid. They may be other package, wich are not aware of lucid. Here is my idea to solve this issue: Introduce a ubunt

Eclipse in software-center

Hi, The software-center does not show all packages, but only a subset of them (the ones that are recognised as applications). The Eclipse software is mapped to the eclipse-platform package. This is a bad choice. There should be Eclipse - Java Development Tools mapped to eclipse-jdt and Eclipse map

Re: icewm_1.2.37+1.3.4pre2-3_amd64.deb broken since Karmic release

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Christian Schugitsch wrote: > Maybe someone has noticed this one: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icewm/+bug/458100 Yes, and I've requested additional information. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify se

Re: Simple question on directfb

Hi, > Debian has made their package compatible with dh 7 [2] in which case > is the dh_installchangelogs option necessary? or will dh 7 pick it up > through dh_auto_install/dh_install ? A run of dh --no-act will show you all the commands still not executed to complete that action ( look at th

Re: icewm_1.2.37+1.3.4pre2-3_amd64.deb broken since Karmic release

Maybe someone has noticed this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icewm/+bug/458100 Joao Pinto schrieb: > Did you file a bug report :) ? > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Christian Schugitsch > wrote: > > I've been waiting for weeks for a usable icewm

Re: icewm_1.2.37+1.3.4pre2-3_amd64.deb broken since Karmic release

Did you file a bug report :) ? On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Christian Schugitsch wrote: > I've been waiting for weeks for a usable icewm package. > Anyone working on a solution? > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscrib

icewm_1.2.37+1.3.4pre2-3_amd64.deb broken since Karmic release

I've been waiting for weeks for a usable icewm package. Anyone working on a solution? -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Ubuntu Domain Server

Am 22.11.2009 um 20:44 schrieb Remco: > We want to cater to administrators with varying degrees of > experience, making them more > productive and less error prone. At least, that's why *I* want GUI > tools. Well said. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubun

Re: Ubuntu Domain Server

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 20:18, Markus Hitter wrote: > > Am 21.11.2009 um 22:38 schrieb Remco: > >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 19:58, Michael Bienia wrote: >>> >>> On 2009-11-21 17:37:46 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: Oh, perhaps

Re: Ubuntu Domain Server

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher < christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: > > >> Letting someone use gparted to partition his disk who doesn't know > >> anything about partitioning will probably end in a big data desaster. > >> And whom will this user blame for it? C

Re: Ubuntu Domain Server

Am 21.11.2009 um 22:38 schrieb Remco: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 19:58, Michael Bienia > wrote: >> On 2009-11-21 17:37:46 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: >>> >>> Oh, perhaps you prefer command line disk partitioning over >>> gparted as >>

Topic change: What do you think of Quickly?

Has anyone on here tried out Quickly? It's a new tool in Ubuntu 9.10 that does these things: 1. Includes a template for Glade that does a lot of the ground-work of UI design for you (backend in Python) 2. Makes it easy to use bzr as version control on your own system for your project 3. Builds Deb

Re: Ubuntu Domain Server

>> Letting someone use gparted to partition his disk who doesn't know >> anything about partitioning will probably end in a big data desaster. >> And whom will this user blame for it? Certainly not himself for doing >> tasks he doesn't understand but the GUI for letting it do him (even if >> it ha