> > Deciding that those defaults actually would be is another kettle of > fish entirely and I surmise that a democratic process of some sort, > perhaps brainstorm, would be a good way to settle this inherently > political section. >
That can of worms has to be opened and emptied. The one single problem about adopting 'Linux' has pretty much been a lack of a uniform standard whether it comes to administration or programming. We can thank the Linux kernel developers for contributing to this with their 'moving target interfaces' mantra too. I guess we can sigh with relief that at least with respects to office software, there is more or less one standard - Openoffice and ODF. > Finally, I think it's fair to give MS its due here. Whether by fair > means or foul, MS has a commanding presence in the market and we > simply have to accept that as the way things currently are. Any > meaningful effort to get market share away from MS needs to be able to > successfully accomodate the windows users and help them migrate, at > least long enough for them to get the feel for "The Linux Way (tm)". > > People used to Windows that are trying out Ubuntu anything for the > first time are from their point of view venturing into uncharted waters. Those same people ventured into uncharted waters before getting used to Windows. You bet that they were quite happy to do the same when they bought their Mac. Of course, if we take the server side angle, it would be a whole different story. Users are probably more willing to learn something new than a certain breed of Microsoft administrators that is forever implied at here. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
