On 08/15/2010 10:48 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Benjamin Drung [2010-08-14 20:51 +0200]:
>>> I am asking this question, because libstdc++5 was removed from karmic
>>> and it was recently reintroduces in maverick.
>>
>> I
Hi Lionel (2010.08.15_17:48:56_+0200)
> AFAIK (and according to LP), it wasn't autosynced but instead
> reintroduced manually by a developer using syncpackage
I sponsored that (using syncpackage). And yes it had to go through NEW
again. Was there someone else I should have asked?
> I wasn't reall
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Benjamin Drung [2010-08-14 20:51 +0200]:
> > I am asking this question, because libstdc++5 was removed from karmic
> > and it was recently reintroduces in maverick.
>
> I wasn't really happy about libstdc++ returning to mav
Hello,
Benjamin Drung [2010-08-14 20:51 +0200]:
> I am asking this question, because libstdc++5 was removed from karmic
> and it was recently reintroduces in maverick.
I wasn't really happy about libstdc++ returning to maverick, but it
kind of "just happened" through autosyncs.
-backports sounds
