On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:22 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Reuben Thomas writes:
> > In the last two and a half years, it has twice received the attentions
> > of Ubuntu developers. Once, two months after I filed it; once, just
> > now. Each time the developer changed some tags.
> [ ... ]
> > it's 30s
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:22 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
> > it's 30s of editing. Arguably, my bad for not providing
> > a patch; but again, I thought that would be a waste of time, because
> > it would take longer for me to produce a patch, be sure that it was
> > clean, and applied to the latest ve
Reuben Thomas writes:
> In the last two and a half years, it has twice received the attentions
> of Ubuntu developers. Once, two months after I filed it; once, just
> now. Each time the developer changed some tags.
[ ... ]
> it's 30s of editing. Arguably, my bad for not providing
> a patch; but aga
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:44:55PM +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Just now, I got a notification about a bug I filed two and a half years ago:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pmount/+bug/237361
>
> It's a trivial man page formatting bug.
>
> In the last two and a half years, it has
Hello Reuben,
Reuben Thomas [2011-02-04 12:44 +]:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pmount/+bug/237361
>
> It's a trivial man page formatting bug.
> Now, I don't want to downplay the importance of correct tagging of
> bugs, but, as I said, this is a trivial documentation bug. How ab
Just now, I got a notification about a bug I filed two and a half years ago:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pmount/+bug/237361
It's a trivial man page formatting bug.
In the last two and a half years, it has twice received the attentions
of Ubuntu developers. Once, two months after I
