Markus Hitter [2008-11-20 17:01 +0100]:
> Well, if you edit a system file as a normal user, you'd have to provide
> the password, don't you? That's like "vi" vs. "sudo vi".
Right, but sudo always times out quickly, whereas PK privileges
potentially stay forever. Also, sudo is a mechanism to run o
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 17:01 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 20.11.2008 um 16:29 schrieb Martin Pitt:
>
> > There goes the remaining bit of user/admin separation which we have,
> > and we can just as well have anyone work as root in the first place.
>
> Well, if you edit a system file as a normal
> This "strawman" sounds awfully similar to a mass feature request.
Like a largely ignored mass requested feature :).
Stefano
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-dis
Am 20.11.2008 um 16:29 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> There goes the remaining bit of user/admin separation which we have,
> and we can just as well have anyone work as root in the first place.
Well, if you edit a system file as a normal user, you'd have to
provide the password, don't you? That's like
tacone [2008-11-19 13:56 +0100]:
> What I've been told is the gedit implementation was *not hard to do*.
That sounds overly optimistic to me. In order to teach gedit to edit
system files as normal user, you need a PolicyKit protected backend
which runs as root (probably D-BUS activated).
This mea
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:29 AM, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olá Remco e a todos.
>
> On Wednesday 19 November 2008 01:47:15 Remco wrote:
> > But as a temporary fix, Gedit could implement PolicyKit.
>
> Not only gedit but every other editor (kate,kedit, etc)
This "strawm
Olá Remco e a todos.
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 01:47:15 Remco wrote:
> But as a temporary fix, Gedit could implement PolicyKit.
Not only gedit but every other editor (kate,kedit, etc)
--
BUGabundo :o)
(``-_-´´) http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786GPG key 1024D/A1784E
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Remco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:01 AM, tacone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I talked some time ago (1 year) to a gedit developer and he told me
>> that he had a bunch of other things to accomplish things. He wasn't
>> countrary in line o
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:01 AM, tacone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I talked some time ago (1 year) to a gedit developer and he told me
> that he had a bunch of other things to accomplish things. He wasn't
> countrary in line of principle.
It has been mentioned that the best way to fix this is to
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:31 PM, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the lon subject, but it says it all:
> This is one of those next-release subjects that keeps coming. Is there any
> interests in discussing on the UDS and starting patching most used apps
> (mostly e
Sorry for the lon subject, but it says it all:
This is one of those next-release subjects that keeps coming. Is there any
interests in discussing on the UDS and starting patching most used apps (mostly
editors) so that when required they escalate privileges and ask the user (if
s/he is on th
11 matches
Mail list logo