warded message --
> > From: Remco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Feb 6, 2008 3:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client
> > To: Bryan Quigley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > On Feb 6, 2008 2:44 AM, Bryan Quigley
On Feb 7, 2008 7:46 PM, Remco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed I didn't actually send this to the list... here it is.
>
> Remco
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Remco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Feb 6, 2008 3:33 AM
> Subject: Re:
I noticed I didn't actually send this to the list... here it is.
Remco
-- Forwarded message --
From: Remco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 6, 2008 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client
To: Bryan Quigley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Feb 6, 20
On Feb 6, 2008 1:36 PM, Jonathan Musther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to be the only one who likes Transmission. I really don't think
> it's fair to call the interface crappy, it's difference from deluge, but
> perhaps more in keeping with Ubuntu (and Gnome) in that it's main window is
> s
I seem to be the only one who likes Transmission. I really don't think it's
fair to call the interface crappy, it's difference from deluge, but perhaps
more in keeping with Ubuntu (and Gnome) in that it's main window is simple,
to get more technical info you have to open the details window. Let's
On Feb 5, 2008 8:44 PM, Bryan Quigley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated
> client.
>
But that interface was crappy.
I won't argue on the system requirements though. Aside from the memory
usage you noticed, I tend to renice Deluge
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:20 -0500, Vadim Peretokin wrote:
> If I remember right, Transmission was chosen over Deluge because the
> devs thought both had similar features, but Deluge had an option to
> password-protect the tray in some tab under preferences, which someone
> didn't like. So..
For
My initial reaction was similar. However, in transmissions favor
*Memory usage* (quick test)
Deluge at 23 Mb
Transmission at 7 Mb
The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated
client. I think one of the big factors is that deluge has a wizard to get
you setup while tran
Deluge is more popular, checking with the sample given from
popcon.ubuntu.com.
If I remember right, Transmission was chosen over Deluge because the devs
thought both had similar features, but Deluge had an option to
password-protect the tray in some tab under preferences, which someone
didn't like
Hello, I'm new here,
I would like to comment on the decision to make Transmission the
default bittorrent client in Hardy. Why was this program chosen? It
seems to me (though, as a fan, I'm biased) that Deluge is more popular
and more familiar (looks like µTorrent & Azureus). Transmission has a
bit
10 matches
Mail list logo
