Ubuntu Maintainers--
First, ya'll are gods. It is amazing how much works perfectly.
"doxygen" package, version 1.5.5-1ubuntu1: I think there is a missing
dependency on texlive-fonts-recommended. That is, when doxygen is used to
make LaTeX documents (pdflatex).
Explanation: I
Hi Norbert,
Norbert Preining [2007-05-16 8:49 +0200]:
> On Die, 15 Mai 2007, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > BTW, the poppler patch is not perfect yet since some parts of
> > texlive-bin still use the internal xpdf. I kept that on my TODO list,
> > but it wasn't necessary to bo
ppler patch for Ubuntu, we have adopted it and meanwhile also SuSE
> does something similar. Why was it dropped for Ubuntu?
I'm a bit confused. Of course we did not remove the poppler patch, I
just had to port it to the poppler 0.5 API again. The other change we
recently got was to build li
Ming Hua wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:36:11AM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> >
>
>> >> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> >>
>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:46:25PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
>>> >>>
>>>
I'll have time to give him a hand). My concern was
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:36:11AM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > As always, I think it's best to hold any discussion on ubuntu-devel until
> > it's clear that there is a need for a new list. Otherwise, you risk
> > creating an underactive list which only serves to isolate t
Hi,
Ming Hua [2007-04-26 21:13 -0500]:
> I'd like to add that in Debian, for the teTeX -> TeXlive transition,
> after tetex is removed and texlive 2007 is uploaded and becomes the
> default TeX package, a lot of work still needs to be done to check and
> fix the new {b
Ming Hua wrote:
> Also, adding a new list have the problem of making interested people
> subscribe, set up filter, etc., while discussing on ubuntu-devel
> requires no extra efforts.
Hrm, good point. It'd be kind of nice if Launchpad automatically set up
mail aliases or somesuch for its groups (on
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:36:11AM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:46:25PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> >> I'll have time to give him a hand). My concern was actually more dealing
> >> with the broken deps and invariable upgrade/install issues that
[Resending from the subscribed address. Sorry for possible duplicate
mails since mailman won't accept cancellation requests more than three
days old.]
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:39:06PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
>
> > > 3. Transitions. I think gutsy will mostly likely see a
y merge list anyway (being 'touched it
> last'), and it will make sure that it happens early, so that you guys
> can give it some polishing. :)
For the record, I did this today before the opening of gutsy, to have
all the latest texlive bits in place (since they are common as build
de
(sorry, accidentally sent to Matt, instead of to list.)
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:46:25PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
>> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> I'll have time to give him a hand). My concern was actually more dealing
>> with the broken deps and invariable upgrade/install
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:46:25PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I'll have time to give him a hand). My concern was actually more dealing
> with the broken deps and invariable upgrade/install issues that people
> seem to have with a transition like this. I put in a request f
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:39:06PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>> 3. Transitions. I think gutsy will mostly likely see a tetex -> texlive
>>>> 2007 transition although I haven't seen any specs are talk
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:39:06PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
>
> > > 3. Transitions. I think gutsy will mostly likely see a tetex -> texlive
> > > 2007 transition although I haven't seen any specs are talk about that.
> > > Maybe a good topic of discu
Hi,
Michael R. Head [2007-04-21 0:33 -0400]:
> > 3. Transitions. I think gutsy will mostly likely see a tetex -> texlive
> > 2007 transition although I haven't seen any specs are talk about that.
> > Maybe a good topic of discussion?
>
> Debian/sid has alre
> > 3. Transitions. I think gutsy will mostly likely see a tetex -> texlive
> > 2007 transition although I haven't seen any specs are talk about that.
> > Maybe a good topic of discussion?
>
> Debian/sid has already transitioned, so won't gutsy automati
On Friday April 20 2007 5:29:19 pm Jordan Mantha wrote:
>
>
> tephens comcast.net> writes:
> > Is anyone developing texlive? It seems that no one really works on it;
> > occasionally one of the devs sticks the debian package in the ubuntu
> > repos.
> >
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 15:29 -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
>
> tephens comcast.net> writes:
> >
> > Is anyone developing texlive? It seems that no one really works on it;
> > occasionally one of the devs sticks the debian package in the ubuntu
> > repos.
tephens comcast.net> writes:
>
> Is anyone developing texlive? It seems that no one really works on it;
> occasionally one of the devs sticks the debian package in the ubuntu
> repos.
> I would really like to see it better maintained, and I am willing to work
> on
>
Is anyone developing texlive? It seems that no one really works on it;
occasionally one of the devs sticks the debian package in the ubuntu repos.
I would really like to see it better maintained, and I am willing to work on
it, but I don't really know where/how to begin. If anyone ha
20 matches
Mail list logo
