Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> In reality [performance] was an overall goal, and one which we did
> pursue with a
> vengeance. The number of timeouts dropped to under 10 a day (!!) for the
> whole site over the 3.0 release, and dozens of pages which issues O(n)
> queries were fixed.
Cool! Sin
Due to my lack of knowledge of Linux I do not manage to get this
program up-and-running.
My Linux OS is Ubuntu 8.04.1 LTS Desktop Edition.
Can you help me with it?
Thank you very much in advance, kind regards, Daniel
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or u
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 06:04:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Personally, I think the user feedback that I'm seeing is very clear.
> Unfortunately it doesn't seem to match up with what is already decided so
> it will likely be discounted and ignored.
Nothing is decided. We're only now star
Hi there.
When I run Aptitude under Kubuntu 8.04, it lists the package
emacs-extra. Its description is "very long description to put here." I
installed it and all it did as far as I could tell was to turn my emacs
display to white text on black, even though I invoked the -fg and -bg
options on
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:23:06 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand, the feedback I get,
despite me asking otherwise, doesn't really give me much to work on --
there is too much talking down our process, where what I am looking for
is m
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:23:06 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand, the feedback I get,
>despite me asking otherwise, doesn't really give me much to work on --
>there is too much talking down our process, where what I am looking for
>is more encouraging feedbac
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:11:01 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 06:04:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Personally, I think the user feedback that I'm seeing is very clear.
>> Unfortunately it doesn't seem to match up with what is already decide
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:28:02 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:41:22AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I idled in #Launchpad for quite somee time after the latest U/I shuffle.
I
>> saw a lot of people show up to complain. I only saw two peopl
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:22:55PM -0700, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
> I'm just a newcomer to the world of Ubuntu development and Launchpad,
> but I agree 100%. When 'ordinary' pages in LP say things like:
>
> at least 77 queries issued in 7.48 seconds
>
> (that was for https://bugs.launchpad.net/
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:41:22AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I idled in #Launchpad for quite somee time after the latest U/I shuffle. I
> saw a lot of people show up to complain. I only saw two people (not
> involved in Launchpad development) speak in favor of it. I've heard a lot
> of
> Indeed, the version should end with "-0ubuntu1" and the distribution
> should be "intrepid".
Ok, fixed.
> > Ah, that's an interesting one which brings up another question. The
> > 'lie' package is actually only needed during build because the
> > autoconf script checks that this program is inst
Hi,
2008/8/22 Jose Luis Blanco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is because you used the version postfix "-1" which is associated to
> Debian. Then, lintian expects you to put "unstable" as distribution (or
> "stable",etc..). I think you can also use "-0ubuntu1" and then use the
> "hardy" distribution (
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:38:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >The list Reinhard discussed with you was related to Bugs. I've taken
> >your second bits of feedback into account for our global priorities, but
> >signed PPAs were also his #1 pick for the Soyuz list, so you're well
> >covered.
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
