Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> Emmet Hikory wrote:
>> As Archive Reorganisation moves forward, and components go away
>> entirely, I expect this becomes even more complicated, but I still
>> think that it is handled better by an integrated ubuntu-security team
>> (perhaps with only a subset authori
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:28 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> > Due to limitations in Launchpad, MOTU-SWAT still needs to be a separate
> > team from ubuntu-security (this is due to the ubuntu-security PPA
> > containing embargoed items and the fact that you must be a member of
> > ubuntu-security to pu
On 22/02/10 15:06, Iain Lane wrote:
> Hiya all,
>
> Thanks to Emmet for raising these important issues.
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:53:09PM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
>> Fellow MOTU,
>>
>> During the Jaunty UDS, discussions of Archive Reorganisation (0)
>> indicated that MOTU would be no more, a
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 08:46 -0600, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> So far, we've been doing all review as well
> as publication, but MOTU-SWAT can get involved in the review process
> which is really the most important part
Correction-- the *most* important part is someone doing updates,
followed by rev
Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> Emmet Hikory wrote:
>> iii) MOTU SWAT needs help, especially as it moves from "universe" to
>> "unseeded packages". I believe that extended discussion is worthwhile
>> between the MOTU SWAT team and the Ubuntu Security team to determine
>> if all security efforts could fo
Iain Lane wrote:
> Emmet Hikory wrote:
>> A) Leadership
<...>
>> ii) Coordinate with all the other Ubuntu Developer Teams to set up a
>> distribution-wide REVU Coordination team, with representatatives from
>> each development group helping to ensure that packages of interest to
>> each area are we
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 12:53 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> iii) MOTU SWAT needs help, especially as it moves from "universe" to
> "unseeded packages". I believe that extended discussion is worthwhile
> between the MOTU SWAT team and the Ubuntu Security team to determine
> if all security efforts cou
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 14:06 +, Iain Lane wrote:
> >iii) MOTU SWAT needs help, especially as it moves from "universe" to
> >"unseeded packages". I believe that extended discussion is worthwhile
> >between the MOTU SWAT team and the Ubuntu Security team to determine
> >if all security efforts co
Hi,
Am Monday 22 February 2010 15:06:03 schrieb Iain Lane:
> The documentation again needs to be cleared up to reflect the now
> unified process across the whole distribution. I hope that each team can
> take an action to do this. (particularly the release team's Feature
> Freeze Exception page. I
Hiya all,
Thanks to Emmet for raising these important issues.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:53:09PM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Fellow MOTU,
During the Jaunty UDS, discussions of Archive Reorganisation (0)
indicated that MOTU would be no more, and all of us should have
received a request for fe
10 matches
Mail list logo
