Hello list,
I have posted a question in askubuntu.com and Doug Smythies has
recommended me to point to the question in this mailing list:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/813389/nested-unprivilaged-lxc-containers-from-upstart-that-its-owner-can-stop
Take care,
Ivan Ogai
--
ubuntu-server
On Oct 8, 2007, at 8:45 AM, Tom Bamford wrote:
> Being a multiprocessor system, will the 'noapic' or 'nolapic'
> options have any major side effects?
No. There'll be a performance decrease in IRQ routing, but it should
negligible unless you're dealing with
ight.
Try adding the 'noapic nolapic acpi=off' options to the end of your
kernel boot line and see if that stops the freezes. I've seen this
behavior on Dell kits before.
Cheers,
--
Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://radian.org
--
ubuntu-server mailing lis
done yet is because GUI server administration tools are notoriously
broken, insecure, or incomplete. Consult the list archives for previous
discussions about this.
--
Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
Bill Asher wrote:
> I’m looking for encouragement to go with Ubuntu Server in our production
Ubuntu Server is a top-notch server distribution; it's used to great
effect in large, high-profile, and mission-critical deployments.
--
Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C72
David Abrahams wrote:
> some package I can use to measure disk, cpu, fpu, etc. performance?
stress(1) for I/O, CPU, VM, disk; iperf(1) for network.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
nt that RAID and LVM
support is actually broken in d-i, we'll certainly try to provide fixes
in the next point release.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
Chris Jones wrote:
> See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperPointReleaseProcess
I should have been more specific. I was there for the PointRelease BoF,
but was addressing the OP's request for immediately updated ISOs that
resolve his bug, which won't happen.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL P
Mike Noordermeer wrote:
> Why exactly isn't a Reply-To header pointing to the list?
Because not munging Reply-To is the default mailman setting, and we
haven't bothered changing it, since there's usually no reason to.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
I
A ten-second google: http://ubuntu.hugi.is/releases/6.06/
> Great Support ...
We provide great security support. You, however, are making an
unreasonable request and being immature about it. The release has been
made. All developer effort is focused on the next one, except for
security updates. This has al
ntu kernel hackers)
The release is frozen. No further work is, or will be, done on Dapper
except fixing security bugs.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
Jacobo Arvelo "UNIX4ALL" wrote:
> please deliver patched isos
The Dapper ISO images are frozen; they will not be updated unless
required by special circumstances.
> ( maybe in the daily dapper drake server isos ? )
These are equally frozen.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
r server?]
From: Francesco Lodolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Liam Proven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [2] Thanks for the tip, but it is just a tip, rather than actual
> guidance. How do I actually go about changing the kernel of a
> not-yet
Original Message
Subject: Re: What's the min spec for Dapper server?
From: Liam Proven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 6/15/06, Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The server kernel is i686 only. There's a non-server
nel
package that's built for i386.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
should be using linux-image-server and linux-headers-server.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
t doesn't get done that way, it'll likely be high up on the Server
Team's list for Edgy.
People with other server-related ideas should post about them on the
ubuntu-server list or approach me on IRC, so Adam and I can discuss them
at UFK. Specifications are strongly encouraged, bu
ross-posting to ubuntu-server, where there might also be interest.)
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyway long story short. please, please please with sugar on top
include lynx on the server install cd.
Will be done.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know is ubuntu Operating System free for enterprise server also?
Yes, it is. There is no non-free version of Ubuntu, both in the freedom
and the cost sense; this is part of the Ubuntu commitment.
--
Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x14
20 matches
Mail list logo
