I used nemo on Xfce and then needed to restart the computer, because
evolution became unusable.
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat .xsession-errors.old
[snip]
(evolution:29168): dconf-CRITICAL **: unable to create file
'/run/user/1000/dconf/user': Permission denied.
dconf will not work properly.
[snip
On my machine Mate seems to be better than Cinnamon, but I had bad luck
with moderators on the Mate forum. One is a stalker and gave me a
warning and their claims are bizarre, e.g. "gvfs is a hard dependency,
if you don't install it, then you won't get support" vs "use Debain,
there it isn't a hard
I've had great results using Cinnamon in video production, with
multiple workspaces , with Kdenlive, Audacity, and Gimp all running
at the same time. No idea if it will last, or if gnome-shell's "classic
mode "(now not very customizable) will replace it, or what. One thing's
for sure, I'm not goin
I've done direct tests comparing compositing to noncompositing desktops of
otherwises
similar "weight" on machines barely able to play 720P video. Both my netbook,
which
uses the Intel video driver, and a Pentium 4 2GHZ with Radeon 1650 (r500
driver) will
play a 720p/30fps/H264 video without fal
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
IMO a serious alternate DE for a production environment is LXDE.
I am not sure LXDE would make an improvement over xfce. The production SW
pulls in a lot of stuff. Some of the video SW we ship pulls in a lot of
the KDE desktop stuff, that once run
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 06:19 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> One too old one too new and one too slow :P
That a graphics is too slow might happen, but is very unusual. As you
and I already pointed out, usually it's the graphics driver that does
cause an issue and for audio usage kernel real-time settings
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 13:44 +0100, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
> I would NOT reconmend any compositing DE for a dual core or
> single-core machine used for any form of performance-critical work
> like multitrack audio or video editing.
This is one issue, while your assumption anyway is wrong, t
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 14:42 +0200, Maik Adamietz wrote:
> No, as far is i'm aware of it Xfce will be the main DE for ubuntu
> studio. The users can choose from install what DE they want to use if
> i remember correct, we try to provide Cinnamon, Gnome 3, Unity and KDE
> as DE option.
If the instal
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Do you plan to switch from Xfce to Cinnamon? I don't understand this
devel thread.
Not at all. I think we have addressed this question before actually, but,
we are trying to make most of the workfows work on any DE. The
ubuntustudio ISO and distro
No, I have been experimenting with an attempt to build a Cinnamon meta for US
as an alternate desktop, springing from discussions in the early summer about
other DE's with UbuntuStudio. I use Cinnamon myself in a personalized OS that
descended from what was originally US Hardy, following rolling u
No, as far is i'm aware of it Xfce will be the main DE for ubuntu studio.
The users can choose from install what DE they want to use if i remember
correct, we try to provide Cinnamon, Gnome 3, Unity and KDE as DE option.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Do you plan to switc
Do you plan to switch from Xfce to Cinnamon? I don't understand this
devel thread.
I installed Cinnamon and Mate to my Arch Linux and decided it not to
install to my Ubuntu Studio, because both DEs can't be used seriously
for a production environment.
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-
12 matches
Mail list logo