On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:12 AM, ttoine wrote:
>
>
>> Another issue are the Linux (audio) communities. There unlikely is a
>> place with more narrow-minded narcissist then Linux (audio) communities.
>>
>
> I agree. This has always been a serious issue, from the beginning of
>
64 Studio, Dynabolic, AV LInux, ... were not easy to use Linux distros.
e.g: I tried to install 64 studio on my pc, without success. That is why
Ubuntu was superior for users at this time. And most of these projects
disappear many years ago... Ubuntu Studio, however, is still here, and is
one of
Thanks a lot for your email.
Like often with open source projects, users are not enough in the center of
developer mind. We need to make it more easy for users to adopt Ubuntu
Studio !!!
Antoine THOMAS
Tél: 0663137906
2015-09-04 9:40 GMT+02:00 C. F. Howlett :
> Perhaps
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:37:03 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>I will lead the coding of it, and will invite everyone to have
>opinions on features and design once I have the barebones up and
>running. Using whatever we have already discussed as base.
Instead of a GUI, something with an visudo/make
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:40:54 +0800, C. F. Howlett wrote:
>I had SO MUCH fun doing all kinds of multimedia things that would
>otherwise have been prohibitively expensive under my other OS, and
>I've happily dualbooted Ubuntustudio since its first release.
That's a good evidence that the Linux
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, at 04:55 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:37:03 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> >I will lead the coding of it, and will invite everyone to have
> >opinions on features and design once I have the barebones up and
> >running. Using whatever we have already discussed
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:12:36 +0200, ttoine wrote:
>So, at the moment, you are right. But in the future, it depends on us.
>
>So again, the question: do we do that with Ubuntu Studio ? or does it
>need a new project with another name, like Elementary OS and Mint ?
We stay with Ubuntu to provide an
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:59:51 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
>For something totally tuned and optimized to one system and one user,
>the usual recommendation is something like Gentoo.
IIRC regarding a poll Ubuntu and Arch are the most used distros by Linux
audio users, so I would recommend
For something totally tuned and optimized to one system and one user, the
usual recommendation is something like Gentoo. probably better for my uses
but no way in hell I'd want to have to tech support this for someone else. For
those who are not hackers, Ubuntu-based distros still have a lot
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Set Hallstrom wrote:
This makes me feel like i'm going to break a leg soon. I've never had
any problem finding hardware. Scanners, AIs, graphic cards,
midicontrolers PCIe-cards What am i doing right?
Running stock as installed? In general things have worked for me
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
The gui will be important for the largest amount of users, so I can not
see -controls without one.
But, of course, we could have command line options as well, or have a
separate command line tool with access to the same functions as the
-controls
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015, at 10:52 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015, at 06:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> I keep it short, I can run ubuntustudio-controls(-pkexec) from command
> >> linem, but starting by the menu doesn't work. There are a few
>
12 matches
Mail list logo