On January 3, 2019 3:52:50 AM UTC, Erich Eickmeyer
wrote:
>
>On 1/2/2019 5:21 PM, Set Sakrecoer wrote:
>> Maybe you have reverted to the old logo and I've just missed out, but
>> on this wiki page there only seem to be the "corrrupt" version of the
>>
phic lead from Xubuntu (the Nick is escaping my memory right now,
sorry) corrected the distorted path seen in those available on the wiki page
linked above during 16.04 cycle.
It's been really difficult to remove the broken logo, so i'm not blaming
anyone. I'll show you the l
On April 11, 2018 9:09:13 PM GMT+02:00, Len Ovens wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>
>> I’ve been speaking with Simon Quigley and he suggested that, due to
>> manpower, we drop 18.04 from being LTS and just go with a 9-month
>> release for this cycle. Thoughts?
>
>This is OK w
On March 30, 2018 12:17:51 PM GMT+02:00, Lord Jonathan Moore
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace
>would
>be better it is faster to use than patchage. And looks more organized
>with
>a ladish session. I would like an opinion on ladish vs jack,
>
>
>Th
Greetings list!
This came in today in #ubuntu-devel:
sakrecoer: hey Set, how are you? I sent
https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntustudio.zesty.drop-pm-utils/+merge/312134
(trivial), would you have a minute to merge/pull it?
I know how to do the merge/pull, and i understand it
On 2016-08-12 14:55, ttoine wrote:
Set, can we add the Hellotux shop to this page on the website?
http://ubuntustudio.org/merchandise/
I would also like to start the work on the Stickermule stickers, I will
of
course send you the prototype before, to be sure you all agree.
BTW, I see that the
On 2016-07-28 14:33, Set Hallstrom wrote:
This afternoon i will try put together
Yeah... it became this evening, better than mañana? :D
Anyways, here it is:
http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/render.png
Misunderstand me right: this is _not_ how it /must/ look, it is just an
attempt to put tog
On 2016-07-08 03:37, Devin wrote:
On 07/07/2016 05:58 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote:
Also I still think that a clear, "official-ish" message from the
> core team of Ubuntu Studio would be a great asset. So far, I have
> been telling people that "If NEC students provide bug reports,
> Ubuntu developers
On 2016-07-07 05:37, C. F. Howlett wrote:
The proposed message looks good.
C. F. Howlett
Thanks cfhowlett and Len :)
Krytarik did a deep digging and found/corrected quite a few errors and
it is now live on:
http://ubuntustudio.org/2016/07/backports-the-benefits-and-the-consequences/
I think
On 2016-06-21 13:26, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 03:48:07 -0400, Jimmy Sjölund wrote:
IMHO, why wouldn't we recommend or endorse using Tails instead of
Ubuntu Studio in those circumstances? Tails include most of the
applications we do but are focused on security way more than we are.
Hi list, and specifically Ross,
This was brought to my attention:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1584930
and its all "\o/ yay! Ross rocks yet again!"
I read it like an open invitation to the devel-team to test the
backports but maybe it has a specific team? I'd gladly partic
11 matches
Mail list logo
