On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:14:40 +0200, Filipe Coelho wrote:
>Correct.
>There's some alternatives for SFZ file handling I can later implement
>if this becomes a very desired feature.
My apologies, I didn't see that mails followed.
It's not the point to provide an alternative to linuxsampler, since
On 10-09-2015 08:20, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:46:17 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
make features
Be careful with features, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/carla-git/.
Carla depends on linuxsampler,
I want to point out that it's an *optional* dependency.
Carla will build
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:54:24 +0200, I wrote:
>LOSS
A typo, it should read FLOSS :D.
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:23:15 +0200, Filipe Coelho wrote:
>Again, it's *optional*.
That's not the correct definition of an "optional dependency".
You can build without linuxsampler and then linuxsampler is neither an
optional nor a hard dependency. It is a build time option, to drop
features, but
On 10-09-2015 10:18, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
What is your argument against including linuxsampler to the
repositories? Assumed it should be the customised GPL, than why do you
accept software of people who use the GPL word by word, but anyway have
a strange attitude?
Is this directed towards me?
I
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
At next take a look at who are Debian multimedia maintainers or
belong to the Ubuntu Studio crew and in what projects they are
involved ;). I'm just kidding, there's no conspiracy (but some really
contribute to Ardour and not to Linuxsampler), anyway, I
On 09/09/2015 11:46 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
> Just as a side point, there seems to be a feeling in the debian
> packaging tools that waf should not be used rather than just fixing the
> packaging tools to work with it.
Yes - waf is a pain for Debian.
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#waf &
On 09-09-2015 23:46, Len Ovens wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Ross Gammon wrote:
On 08/31/2015 11:02 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Ross Gammon wrote:
I was just looking at a couple of bugs against zynjacku, and it turns
out that this package was removed from Debian a while ago
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Filipe Coelho wrote:
oh hi there!
Nice to see someone interested on packaging Carla.
I think it is a good addition to Linux Audio. Fills a place that will soon
be empty.
Note that I recommend going with the latest beta release.
If this is really going into Debian I
On 08/31/2015 11:02 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Ross Gammon wrote:
>
>> I was just looking at a couple of bugs against zynjacku, and it turns
>> out that this package was removed from Debian a while ago because it is
>> buggy and abandoned upstream
>
> zynjacku can be replaced
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Ross Gammon wrote:
I was just looking at a couple of bugs against zynjacku, and it turns
out that this package was removed from Debian a while ago because it is
buggy and abandoned upstream
zynjacku can be replaced with lv2rack and/or jalv. I would also suggest we
On 08/24/2015 10:22 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
It seems that jack-rack runs ok. I could start it up and load some
effects. No crashes for me yet, anyway.
Considering that there is no alternative in the Ubuntu repos, I think we
should keep it at least for wily. So, I will ask for that to be kept.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Ross Gammon wrote:
On 08/24/2015 10:22 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
It seems that jack-rack runs ok. I could start it up and load some
effects. No crashes for me yet, anyway.
Considering that there is no alternative in the Ubuntu repos, I think we
should keep it at least for
It seems that jack-rack runs ok. I could start it up and load some
effects. No crashes for me yet, anyway.
Considering that there is no alternative in the Ubuntu repos, I think we
should keep it at least for wily. So, I will ask for that to be kept.
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:38:15 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
As long as it is functional, it seems there is some reason to keep it.
But, I can't try it until Monday, the earliest.
If we keep it, we become maintainers and it will only exist in Ubuntu.
That leaves us more time to figure out another
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called
multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove.
That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it?
Is there a utility like dssi-host-jack for ladspa plugins to
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 07:23 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called
multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove.
That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it?
Is
phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called
multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove.
That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it?
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:25:36 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
jack-rack
This is a useful package and should be provided.
Is someone willing to maintain it?
And, if so, please look up why Debian is not doing it anymore.
--
ubuntu-studio-devel
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
It seems there are a few packages that have been removed from Debian and
will be removed from Ubuntu as well, unless someone commits to
maintaining them.
The packages in question are:
jack-rack
lv2fil
x42's collection now has an expansion called
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 03:07 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
specimen
There is a fork of this petri-foo that replaces this.
Replaced!
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
It seems there are a few packages that have been removed from Debian and
will be removed from Ubuntu as well, unless someone commits to
maintaining them.
The packages in question are:
jack-rack
lv2fil
specimen
phat
If anyone feels any of those should be kept, please let us know.
--
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:25:36 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
jack-rack
This is a useful package and should be provided.
lv2fil
Keep the package that provides Fons' 4-band parametric EQ, all other
EQs are anyway more or less useless. What filter is provided by this
package? However, even the more or
23 matches
Mail list logo
