Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-26 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Carmelo, While trying to regress test future branch on top of master I have been getting a regression on master on all architectures (arm/ppc/mips/x86/x86_64) where my clutter based image does not render the font properly after boot up ( it draws them with squares for each character) It has b

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: > If I build the root file system without this patch everything works > as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ? it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a branch that isn't a fast forward. it isn't an actual "commit"

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-27 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: >> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works >> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ? > > it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-28 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: >>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works >>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ? >> >> it's a

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-28 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: >>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works >>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ? >> >> it's a

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-28 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: If I build the root file system without this patch everything works as expect

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-29 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: > If I build the root file system with

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-29 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >> wrote: >>> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-30 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> wrote: On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-11-30 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >> wrote: >>> On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-01 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 30/11/2011 22.44, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> wrote: On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMORO

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-01 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 30/11/2011 22.44, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> wrote: On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMORO

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-01 Thread Khem Raj
>> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help >> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3 >> which is merge commit. >> > > so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ? > yes ___ uClibc mailing list uC

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-02 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Dec 1, 2011 8:41 PM, "Khem Raj" wrote: > > >> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help > >> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3 > >> which is merge commit. > >> > > > > so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ? > > > > yes I would

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-02 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 02/12/2011 14.45, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Dec 1, 2011 8:41 PM, "Khem Raj" wrote: >> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3 which is merge commit. >>> >>> so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-05 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote: >>> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help >>> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3 >>> which is merge commit. >>> >> >> so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ? >> > > yes > Hi guys, starting

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-05 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote: yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3 which is merge commit. >>> >>> so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have somethin

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-05 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote: > yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help > I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3 > which is merge commit. >

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-06 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >>> On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote: >> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help >> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-12 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 06/12/2011 11.25, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >> wrote: >>> On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote: >>> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2011-12-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 06/12/2011 11.25, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >> On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> wrote: On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-11 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 06/12/2011 11.25, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >>> On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmel

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-13 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 11/01/2012 8.44, Khem Raj wrote: >>> khem ? any news ? >> >> no unfortunately, had no time to delve further. once I have turned a >> merge into patch which was causing the regression, let me go down that >> path. >> let > > hi Carmelo > Hi khem > Attached patch is causing the trouble. and I

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not >> elfinterp changes >> too. Mostly it seems likely that it could be in the way the scopes are >> being handled >> > > we have reviewed several times this change before c

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >>> and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not >>> elfinterp changes >>> too. Mostly it seems likely that it could be in the way the scopes are >>> being handled

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >> wrote: and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not elfinterp changes too. Mostly it seems likely tha

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> wrote: > and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not >>>

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-15 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> and since I see the same issu

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-15 Thread Khem Raj
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Ca

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-16 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrot

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-16 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO >> wrote: >>> On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-16 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 16/01/2012 10.36, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >> On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> wrote: On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> O

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >> On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> wrote: On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wr

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-17 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 17/01/2012 2.59, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >>> On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote: On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote: >

Re: Regression caused by commit 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3

2012-01-17 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 17/01/2012 9.41, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 17/01/2012 2.59, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >> wrote: >>> On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wro