Hi Carmelo,
While trying to regress test future branch on top of master
I have been getting a regression on master on all architectures
(arm/ppc/mips/x86/x86_64) where my clutter based image does not
render the font properly after boot up ( it draws them with squares for
each character)
It has b
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ?
it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a branch that isn't a fast
forward. it isn't an actual "commit"
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ?
>
> it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
>>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
>>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ?
>>
>> it's a
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
>>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
>>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ?
>>
>> it's a
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
as expect
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
> If I build the root file system with
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>> wrote:
>>> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:
On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> wrote:
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>> wrote:
>>> On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
wrote:
> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem
On 30/11/2011 22.44, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> wrote:
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMORO
On 30/11/2011 22.44, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> wrote:
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMORO
>> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
>> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
>> which is merge commit.
>>
>
> so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ?
>
yes
___
uClibc mailing list
uC
On Dec 1, 2011 8:41 PM, "Khem Raj" wrote:
>
> >> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
> >> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
> >> which is merge commit.
> >>
> >
> > so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ?
> >
>
> yes
I would
On 02/12/2011 14.45, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2011 8:41 PM, "Khem Raj" wrote:
>>
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
which is merge commit.
>>>
>>> so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1
On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
>>> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
>>> which is merge commit.
>>>
>>
>> so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ?
>>
>
> yes
>
Hi guys,
starting
On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
which is merge commit.
>>>
>>> so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have somethin
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
> which is merge commit.
>
On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>> On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
>> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
>> I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f
On 06/12/2011 11.25, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 06/12/2011 11.25, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>> On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> wrote:
On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 06/12/2011 11.25, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>>> On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmel
On 11/01/2012 8.44, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> khem ? any news ?
>>
>> no unfortunately, had no time to delve further. once I have turned a
>> merge into patch which was causing the regression, let me go down that
>> path.
>> let
>
> hi Carmelo
>
Hi khem
> Attached patch is causing the trouble. and I
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not
>> elfinterp changes
>> too. Mostly it seems likely that it could be in the way the scopes are
>> being handled
>>
>
> we have reviewed several times this change before c
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>>> and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not
>>> elfinterp changes
>>> too. Mostly it seems likely that it could be in the way the scopes are
>>> being handled
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>> wrote:
and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not
elfinterp changes
too. Mostly it seems likely tha
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> wrote:
> and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not
>>>
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
wrote:
>> and since I see the same issu
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
wrote:
> On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Ca
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj wrot
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>> wrote:
>>> On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
On 16/01/2012 10.36, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>> On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> O
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>> On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj wr
On 17/01/2012 2.59, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>>> On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
wrote:
> On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
>
On 17/01/2012 9.41, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 17/01/2012 2.59, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>> wrote:
>>> On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wro
35 matches
Mail list logo