I'd be very happy if we had that integrated into our release process, yes.
I'll see how much we can automate there.
> On 15. Dec 2017, at 14:16, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> I agree with Patrick's (cc'd) comment from the linked issue. What I
> understand from the linked issue is that Patrick will tak
I agree with Patrick's (cc'd) comment from the linked issue. What I
understand from the linked issue is that Patrick will take care of the
Docker image update for 1.4 manually. Is that ok with you Patrick? :-)
Regarding the Flink release process question: I fully agree with the
idea to integrate t
I created the following issue on here:
https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink/issues/29 where it was
suggested I should bring this up on the list.
1.4 has been released. Hurray!
But there isn't yet a dockerfile / image for the release. Furthermore, it
would be nice to have dockerfile / imag