karaf features and maven urls

2013-02-03 Thread lbu
Hi, I would like to know if it possible to set a repository alongside a karaf feauture e.g: feature name=my-feautre-1 version=1.0.0 repository=http://maven.mycompany.com; feature name=my-feautre-2 version=1.0.0 repository=file:///opt/maven feature name=my-feautre-3 version=1.0.0

Re: karaf features and maven urls

2013-02-03 Thread Christian Müller
The current schema [1] doesn't support it. [1] http://karaf.apache.org/manual/2.3.0/users-guide/provisioning-schema.html Best, Christian On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, lbu lburgazz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to know if it possible to set a repository alongside a karaf feauture

Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??

2013-02-03 Thread Dan Tran
My bad it is from http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net I thought Apache policy does allow direct usage of LGPL lib? Thanks -D On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE mentions about LGPL in summary

Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??

2013-02-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
It's aopalliance, required by spring-aop. However, I think this dependency is no more required. I gonna take a look to remove the references. Regards JB On 02/03/2013 07:49 PM, Dan Tran wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE mentions about LGPL in summary

Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??

2013-02-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't embed it in the distribution, it's allowed. Anyway, I don't think that the dependency is required, I will remove it if it's really the case. Regards JB On 02/03/2013 07:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote: My bad it is from

Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??

2013-02-03 Thread Dan Tran
Super thanks for removing that -D Btw, http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net only use 'Public Domain' I dont see LPGL mentioned in that page On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't embed it

Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??

2013-02-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
AFAIR, it's a dual license. On 02/03/2013 07:59 PM, Dan Tran wrote: Super thanks for removing that -D Btw, http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net only use 'Public Domain' I dont see LPGL mentioned in that page On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:

Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??

2013-02-03 Thread Christoph Gritschenberger
According to the homepage [1] it's actually public domain. kind regards, christoph [1] http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/ On 2013-02-03 20:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: AFAIR, it's a dual license. On 02/03/2013 07:59 PM, Dan Tran wrote: Super thanks for removing that -D Btw,

Re: Eclkpselink bundle installation : features vs command

2013-02-03 Thread Freeman Fang
Hi, This error indicates mvn:org.eclipse.persistence/org.eclipse.persistence.asm/3.3.1.v201206041142 isn't a valid OSGi bundle, Netty has a similar issue[1] a while ago, they fixed it. I think you need report this issue to eclipse link community and let them fix it.

Re: Eclkpselink bundle installation : features vs command

2013-02-03 Thread lbu
Hi, thank you I'll report it. For my understanding, why the features fails whereas the command doesn't ? -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Eclkpselink-bundle-installation-features-vs-command-tp4027584p4027607.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list

Re: Class not found exception org.apache.karaf.jaas.boot.principal.RolePrincipal

2013-02-03 Thread Achim Nierbeck
Hi, I'm gonna take a look at it as soon as possible :) might take me a bit though, so don't be to impatient with me :) regards, Achim 2013/2/2 siv vasan svasanta@gmail.com Hi, Probably you did not get my attachments. I have uploaded the sample project to GitHub. Link: