Hi,
I would like to know if it possible to set a repository alongside a karaf
feauture e.g:
feature name=my-feautre-1 version=1.0.0
repository=http://maven.mycompany.com;
feature name=my-feautre-2 version=1.0.0 repository=file:///opt/maven
feature name=my-feautre-3 version=1.0.0
The current schema [1] doesn't support it.
[1]
http://karaf.apache.org/manual/2.3.0/users-guide/provisioning-schema.html
Best,
Christian
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, lbu lburgazz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if it possible to set a repository alongside a karaf
feauture
My bad it is from http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net
I thought Apache policy does allow direct usage of LGPL lib?
Thanks
-D
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE
mentions about LGPL in summary
It's aopalliance, required by spring-aop.
However, I think this dependency is no more required.
I gonna take a look to remove the references.
Regards
JB
On 02/03/2013 07:49 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE
mentions about LGPL in summary
Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't
embed it in the distribution, it's allowed.
Anyway, I don't think that the dependency is required, I will remove it
if it's really the case.
Regards
JB
On 02/03/2013 07:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
My bad it is from
Super thanks for removing that
-D
Btw, http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net only use 'Public Domain' I
dont see LPGL mentioned in that page
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't embed it
AFAIR, it's a dual license.
On 02/03/2013 07:59 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
Super thanks for removing that
-D
Btw, http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net only use 'Public Domain' I
dont see LPGL mentioned in that page
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
According to the homepage [1] it's actually public domain.
kind regards,
christoph
[1] http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/
On 2013-02-03 20:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
AFAIR, it's a dual license.
On 02/03/2013 07:59 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
Super thanks for removing that
-D
Btw,
Hi,
This error indicates
mvn:org.eclipse.persistence/org.eclipse.persistence.asm/3.3.1.v201206041142
isn't a valid OSGi bundle, Netty has a similar issue[1] a while ago, they fixed
it. I think you need report this issue to eclipse link community and let them
fix it.
Hi,
thank you I'll report it.
For my understanding, why the features fails whereas the command doesn't ?
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Eclkpselink-bundle-installation-features-vs-command-tp4027584p4027607.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list
Hi,
I'm gonna take a look at it as soon as possible :)
might take me a bit though, so don't be to impatient with me :)
regards, Achim
2013/2/2 siv vasan svasanta@gmail.com
Hi,
Probably you did not get my attachments. I have uploaded the sample project
to GitHub.
Link:
11 matches
Mail list logo